Improved survival after heart transplantation in patients bridged with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the new allocation system

被引:40
作者
Gonzalez, Matthew H. [1 ]
Acharya, Deepak [2 ]
Lee, Sangjin [1 ]
Leacche, Marzia [3 ]
Boeve, Theodore [3 ]
Manandhar-Shrestha, Nabin [4 ]
Jovinge, Stefan [4 ,5 ]
Loyaga-Rendon, Renzo Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Spectrum Hlth, Adv Heart Failure Sect, 330 Barclay Ave Northeast,Suite 200, Grand Rapids, MI 49503 USA
[2] Univ Arizona, Sarver Heart Ctr, Tucson, AZ USA
[3] Spectrum Hlth, Div Cardiothorac Surg, Grand Rapids, MI USA
[4] SpectrumHealth, Van Andel Inst, DeVos Cardiovasc Res Program, Grand Rapids, MI USA
[5] Stanford Univ, Cardiovasc Inst, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
关键词
extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; heart transplant; allocation system; cardiogenic shock; mechanical circulatory support; OUTCOMES; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1016/j.healun.2020.11.004
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Historically, patients bridged on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) to heart transplantation (HT) have very high post-transplant mortality. In the new heart transplant allocation system, ECMO-supported patients have the highest priority for HT. However, data are lacking on the outcomes of these critically ill patients. We compared the waitlist and post-transplant outcomes of ECMO-supported patients in the new and old allocation systems. METHODS: Adult patients supported by ECMO at the time of listing or transplantation who were registered in the United Network for Organ Sharing database between November 1, 2015 and September 30, 2019 were included. Clinical characteristics, outcomes in the waitlist, and post-transplant survival were compared between the old and new systems. Cox Proportional and subdistribution hazard regression models were used to evaluate the variables contributing to the post-transplant and waitlist outcomes RESULTS: A total of 296 ECMO-supported patients were listed for HT. Of these, 191 were distributed to the old system, and 105 were distributed to the new system. Patients listed in the new system had a higher cumulative incidence of HT (p < 0.001) and lower incidence of death or removal (p = 0.001) from the transplant list than patients listed in the old system. The 6-month survival after transplantation was 74.6% and 90.6% for the old- and new-era patients, respectively (p = 0.002). Among ECMO-supported patients, being listed or transplanted on the new system was independently associated with improved outcomes in the waitlist and after transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: With the implementation of the new heart transplant allocation system, ECMO-supported patients have a shorter waitlist time, improved frequency of HT, and improved short-term post-transplant survival. (C) 2020 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 157
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Introduction to the Analysis of Survival Data in the Presence of Competing Risks [J].
Austin, Peter C. ;
Lee, Douglas S. ;
Fine, Jason P. .
CIRCULATION, 2016, 133 (06) :601-609
[2]   Clinical outcomes of temporary mechanical circulatory support as a direct bridge to heart transplantation: a nationwide Spanish registry [J].
Barge-Caballero, Eduardo ;
Almenar-Bonet, Luis ;
Gonzalez-Vilchez, Francisco ;
Lambert-Rodriguez, Jose L. ;
Gonzalez-Costello, Jose ;
Segovia-Cubero, Javier ;
Castel-Lavilla, Maria A. ;
Delgado-Jimenez, Juan ;
Garrido-Bravo, Iris P. ;
Rangel-Sousa, Diego ;
Martinez-Selles, Manuel ;
De la Fuente-Galan, Luis ;
Rabago-Juan-Aracil, Gregorio ;
Sanz-Julve, Marisa ;
Hervas-Sotomayor, Daniela ;
Mirabet-Perez, Sonia ;
Muniz, Javier ;
Crespo-Leiro, Maria G. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2018, 20 (01) :178-186
[3]   Favorable Outcomes of a Direct Heart Transplantation Strategy in Selected Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support [J].
Coutance, Guillaume ;
Jacob, Nicolas ;
Demondion, Pierre ;
Nguyen, Lee S. ;
Bougle, Adrien ;
Brechot, Nicolas ;
Varnous, Shaida ;
Leprince, Pascal ;
Combes, Alain ;
Lebreton, Guillaume .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 48 (04) :498-506
[4]   A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk [J].
Fine, JP ;
Gray, RJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 94 (446) :496-509
[5]   Heart Allocation in the United States Intended and Unintended Consequences [J].
Givertz, Michael M. .
CIRCULATION-HEART FAILURE, 2012, 5 (02) :140-143
[6]   A change of heart: Preliminary results of the US 2018 adult heart allocation revision [J].
Goff, Rebecca R. ;
Uccellini, Kimberly ;
Lindblad, Kelsi ;
Hall, Shelley ;
Davies, Ryan ;
Farr, Maryjane ;
Silvestry, Scott ;
Rogers, Joseph G. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 20 (10) :2781-2790
[7]   Venoarterial ECMO for Adults JACC Scientific Expert Panel [J].
Guglin, Maya ;
Zucker, Mark J. ;
Bazan, Vanessa M. ;
Bozkurt, Biykem ;
El Banayosy, Aly ;
Estep, Jerry D. ;
Gurley, John ;
Nelson, Karl ;
Malyala, Rajasekhar ;
Panjrath, Gurusher S. ;
Zwischenberger, Joseph B. ;
Pinney, Sean P. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 73 (06) :698-716
[8]   VA-ECMO for cardiogenic shock in the contemporary era of heart transplantation: Which patients should be urgently transplanted? [J].
Habal, Marlena V. ;
Truby, Lauren ;
Ando, Masahiko ;
Ikegami, Hirohisa ;
Garan, Arthur R. ;
Topkara, Veli K. ;
Colombo, Paolo ;
Takeda, Koji ;
Takayama, Hiroo ;
Naka, Yoshifumi ;
Farr, Maryjane A. .
CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 32 (09)
[9]   The Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device in Severe Refractory Cardiogenic Shock [J].
Kar, Biswajit ;
Gregoric, Igor D. ;
Basra, Sukhdeep S. ;
Idelchik, Gary M. ;
Loyalka, Pranav .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 57 (06) :688-696
[10]   Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Cardiogenic Shock [J].
Keebler, Mary E. ;
Haddad, Elias V. ;
Choi, Chun W. ;
McGrane, Stuart ;
Zalawadiya, Sandip ;
Schlendorf, Kelly H. ;
Brinkley, D. Marshall ;
Danter, Matthew R. ;
Wigger, Mark ;
Menachem, Jonathan N. ;
Shah, Ashish ;
Lindenfeld, Joann .
JACC-HEART FAILURE, 2018, 6 (06) :503-516