Visual Performance after Implantable Collamer Lens Implantation and Wavefront-Guided Laser In Situ Keratomileusis for High Myopia

被引:107
|
作者
Igarashi, Akihito [1 ]
Kamiya, Kazutaka [1 ]
Shimizu, Kimiya [1 ]
Komatsu, Mari [2 ]
机构
[1] Kitasato Univ, Sch Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Kanagawa 2288555, Japan
[2] Sanno Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
PHAKIC INTRAOCULAR-LENS; HIGHER-ORDER ABERRATIONS; ADMINISTRATION CLINICAL-TRIAL; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CONTACT-LENS; REFRACTIVE SURGERY; PHOTOREFRACTIVE KERATECTOMY; FOLLOW-UP; SPHERICAL-ABERRATION; ALCON CUSTOMCORNEA;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajo.2009.02.001
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To compare postoperative visual function after implantable collamer lens (ICL; STAAR Surgical, Nidau, Switzerland) implantation and after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (WFG-LASIK) in eyes with high myopia. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational case study. METHODS: We investigated 46 eyes of 33 patients undergoing ICL implantation and 47 eyes of 29 patients undergoing WFG-LASIK (Technolas217z; Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, New York, USA) for the correction of high myopia (manifest spherical equivalent <= -6 diopters). Ocular higher-order aberrations (HOA) and contrast sensitivity (CS) function were measured by Hartmann-Shack aberrometry (KR-9000; Topcon, Tokyo, Japan) and a CS unit (VCTS-6500; Vistech Consultants Inc, Dayton, Ohio, USA) before and 3 months after surgery, respectively. From the CS, the area under the log CS function (AULCSF) was calculated. RESULTS: For a 4-mm pupil, the changes in ocular coma,like aberrations, spherical-like aberrations, and to, tal HOAs after ICL implantation were significantly less than those after WFG-LASIK (P < .001, Mann-Whitney U test). The postoperative AULCSF was significantly increased after ICL implantation (P < .001), whereas after WFG-LASIK, it was significantly de, creased (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: ICL implantation induces significantly fewer ocular HOAs than WFG-LASIK. Moreover, CS was improved significantly after ICL implantation, but deteriorated after WFG-LASIK in eyes with high myopia. Thus, in the correction of high myopia, ICL implantation seems to be superior in visual performance to WFG-LASIK, suggesting that it may be a better surgical option for the treatment of such eyes. (Am J Ophthalmol 2009;148:164-170. (C) 2009 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
引用
收藏
页码:164 / 170
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of optical quality after implantable collamer lens implantation and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis
    Liu, Hong-Ting
    Zhou, Zhou
    Luo, Wu-Qiang
    He, Wen-Jing
    Agbedia, Owhofasa
    Wang, Jiang-Xia
    Huang, Jian-Zhong
    Gao, Xin
    Kong, Min
    Li, Min
    Li, Li
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 11 (04) : 656 - 661
  • [2] Comparison of Higher Order Aberrations After Implantable Collamer Lens Implantation and Wavefront-guided LASEK in High Myopia
    Shin, Joo Youn
    Ahn, Hyunseok
    Seo, Kyoung Yul
    Kim, Eung Kweon
    Kim, Tae-im
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2012, 28 (02) : 106 - U91
  • [3] Visual Performance After Posterior Chamber Phakic Intraocular Lens Implantation and Wayefront-Guided Laser In Situ Keratomileusis for Low to Moderate Myopia
    Kamiya, Kazutaka
    Igarashi, Akihito
    Shimizu, Kimiya
    Matsumura, Kazuhiro
    Komatsu, Mari
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 153 (06) : 1178 - 1186
  • [4] Effect of Myopic Defocus on Visual Acuity after Phakic Intraocular Lens Implantation and Wavefront-guided Laser in Situ Keratomileusis
    Kamiya, Kazutaka
    Shimizu, Kimiya
    Igarashi, Akihito
    Kawamorita, Takushi
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2015, 5
  • [5] Comparison of optical quality parameters and ocular aberrations after wavefront-guided laser in-situ keratomileusis versus wavefront-guided laser epithelial keratomileusis for myopia
    Lee, Kwanghyun
    Ahn, Ji Min
    Kim, Eung Kweon
    Kim, Tae-im
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 251 (09) : 2163 - 2169
  • [6] Visual outcomes after wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: Prospective comparison
    Moshirfar, Majid
    Schliesser, Joshua A.
    Chang, Joann C.
    Oberg, Thomas J.
    Mifflin, Mark D.
    Townley, Richard
    Livingston, Myrna K.
    Kurz, Christopher J.
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2010, 36 (08) : 1336 - 1343
  • [7] Comparison of optical quality parameters and ocular aberrations after wavefront-guided laser in-situ keratomileusis versus wavefront-guided laser epithelial keratomileusis for myopia
    Kwanghyun Lee
    Ji Min Ahn
    Eung Kweon Kim
    Tae-im Kim
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2013, 251 : 2163 - 2169
  • [8] Optical and visual quality comparison of implantable Collamer lens and laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia using an adaptive optics visual simulator
    Perez-Vives, Cari
    Dominguez-Vicent, Alberto
    Garcia-Lazaro, Santiago
    Ferrer-Blasco, Teresa
    Montes-Mico, Robert
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 23 (01) : 39 - 46
  • [9] Wavefront-guided Laser In Situ Keratomileusis in the Treatment of High Myopia by Using the CustomVue Wavefront Platform
    Kulkanthorn, Tharinee
    Silao, John Nathaniel I.
    Torres, Luis F.
    Lim, Janice N.
    Purcell, Tracy L.
    Tantayakom, Theeratep
    Schanzlin, David J.
    CORNEA, 2008, 27 (07) : 787 - 790
  • [10] Combined wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis and aspheric ablation profile with iris registration to correct myopia
    Wu, Junshu
    Zhong, Xingwu
    Yang, Bin
    Wang, Zheng
    Yu, Keming
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 39 (07) : 1059 - 1065