Political economy of crime and punishment under Stalin

被引:11
作者
Belova, Eugenia [2 ]
Gregory, Paul [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Houston, Dept Econ, Houston, TX 77204 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Hoover Inst, Stanford, CA USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Economics of crime; Comparative economics; Dictatorship; Socialism; ENFORCEMENT; MARKET; LAW;
D O I
10.1007/s11127-009-9430-2
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Why do dictatorships favor harsher punishments than democracies? We use a rational choice approach to explain the stylized facts of Stalin's dictatorship-preference for harsh sanctions, higher incarceration rates, greater use of capital punishment, low tolerance for theft of state property and workplace violations. They are shown to be explained by the preferences of a rational dictator, who does not internalize the social and private cost of punishment.
引用
收藏
页码:463 / 478
页数:16
相关论文
共 33 条
[21]  
LUNEEV V, 2006, NASELENIE OBSHESTVO
[22]  
*MIN INT, 1913, STAT EXH ROSS
[23]  
Mozokhin O.B., 2006, PRAVO REPRESSII
[24]  
POLIAKOV IA, 2001, NASELENIE ROSSII 5 2, V2, P1940
[25]   The economic theory of public enforcement of law [J].
Polinsky, AM ;
Shavell, S .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 2000, 38 (01) :45-76
[26]   ENFORCEMENT COSTS AND THE OPTIMAL MAGNITUDE AND PROBABILITY OF FINES [J].
POLINSKY, AM ;
SHAVELL, S .
JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 1992, 35 (01) :133-148
[27]   Stigma and self-fulfilling expectations of criminality [J].
Rasmusen, E .
JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 1996, 39 (02) :519-543
[28]  
Schroder Philipp J. H., 2006, DICTATORS REPRESSION
[29]   CRIMINAL-LAW AND THE OPTIMAL USE OF NONMONETARY SANCTIONS AS A DETERRENT [J].
SHAVELL, S .
COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW, 1985, 85 (06) :1232-1262
[30]  
*SUBC FED DEATH PE, 1998, JUD C US SUBC FED DE