An investigation of thermal behaviour of biomass and coal during copyrolysis using thermogravimetric analysis

被引:57
作者
Vhathvarothai, Navirin [1 ]
Ness, James [1 ]
Yu, Qiming J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Sch Engn, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia
关键词
Thermogravimetric Analysis; TGA; Co-pyrolysis; Thermal behaviour; Biomass; Coal; KINETIC-PARAMETERS; ENERGY-PRODUCTION; PYROLYSIS; COMBUSTION; BLENDS; EQUATION; REACTIVITY; CONVERSION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1002/er.3120
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The biomass, coal and their blends at blending ratios (biomass : coal) of 95:5, 90:10, 85:15 and 80:20 were pyrolysed under a nitrogen environment at four different heating rates comprising 5 degrees C, 10 degrees C, 15 degrees C and 20 degrees C per minute to investigate their pyrolytic behaviour and to determine kinetic parameters of thermal decomposition through Kissinger's corrected kinetic equation using the thermogravimetric analysis results. In the kinetic analysis, the activation energy of both types of biomass was less than that of coal, being 168.7 kJ/mol (cypress wood chips), 164.6 kJ/mol (macadamia nut shells) and 199.6 kJ/mol (Australian bituminous coal). The activation energy of the blends of biomass and coal followed that of the weighted average of the individual samples in the blends. Char production of the samples and the blends was also analysed to observe any synergetic effects and thermal interaction between biomass and coal. The char production of the blends corresponded to the sum of the results for the individual samples with the coefficient of determination of 0.999. Thermal decomposition of biomass and coal appeared to take place independently, and thus, the activation energy of the blends can be calculated from that of the two components. There was no evidence for any significant synergetic effects and thermal interaction between either type of biomass and coal during copyrolysis. Copyright (C) 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1145 / 1154
页数:10
相关论文
共 58 条
[21]   Potential contribution of biomass to the sustainable energy development [J].
Demirbas, M. Fatih ;
Balat, Mustafa ;
Balat, Havva .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2009, 50 (07) :1746-1760
[22]  
Energy research Centre of the Netherlands, DEF US PHYLL
[23]   Sustainability considerations for electricity generation from biomass [J].
Evans, Annette ;
Strezov, Vladimir ;
Evans, Tim J. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2010, 14 (05) :1419-1427
[24]  
Grammelis P, 2011, GREEN ENERGY TECHNOL, P123, DOI 10.1007/978-1-84996-393-0_6
[25]   Will biomass be the environmentally friendly fuel of the future? [J].
Hall, DO ;
Scrase, JI .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 1998, 15 (4-5) :357-367
[26]   Combustion reactivity of different rank coals [J].
Haykiri-Açma, H ;
Ersoy-Meriçboyu, A ;
Küçükbayrak, S .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2002, 43 (04) :459-465
[27]   Investigation on thermochemical behaviour of low rank Malaysian coal, oil palm biomass and their blends during pyrolysis via thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) [J].
Idris, Siti Shawalliah ;
Rahman, Norazah Abd ;
Ismail, Khudzir ;
Alias, Azil Bahari ;
Rashid, Zulkifli Abd ;
Aris, Mohd Jindra .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 101 (12) :4584-4592
[28]   Thermogravimetric studies of the behavior of lignite-biomass blends during devolatilization [J].
Kastanaki, E ;
Vamvuka, D ;
Grammelis, P ;
Kakaras, E .
FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 77 :159-166
[29]   Biomass gasification: Still promising? A 30-year global overview [J].
Kirkels, Arjan F. ;
Verbong, Geert P. J. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2011, 15 (01) :471-481
[30]   A review on gasification of biomass [J].
Kirubakaran, V. ;
Sivaramakrishnan, V. ;
Nalini, R. ;
Sekar, T. ;
Premalatha, M. ;
Subramanian, P. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2009, 13 (01) :179-186