Cervical length screening for prevention of preterm birth in singleton pregnancy with threatened preterm labor: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials using individual patient-level data

被引:97
作者
Berghella, V. [1 ]
Palacio, M. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Ness, A. [5 ]
Alfirevic, Z. [6 ,7 ]
Nicolaides, K. H. [8 ]
Saccone, G. [9 ]
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sidney Kimmel Med Coll, Div Maternal Fetal Med, 833 Chestnut St, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[2] Univ Barcelona, BCNatal Barcelona Ctr Maternal Fetal & Neonatal M, Hosp Clin, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Univ Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Hosp St Joan de Deu, Barcelona, Spain
[4] Ctr Biomed Res Rare Dis CIBER ER, Barcelona, Spain
[5] Stanford Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[6] Univ Liverpool, Dept Womens & Childrens Hlth, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[7] Liverpool Womens Hosp, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[8] Kings Coll Hosp London, Harris Birthright Res Ctr Fetal Med, London, England
[9] Univ Naples Federico II, Sch Med, Dept Neurosci Reprod Sci & Dent, Naples, Italy
关键词
cervical length; preterm birth; preterm labor; transvaginal ultrasound; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1002/uog.17388
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
ObjectiveCervical length screening by transvaginal sonography (TVS) has been shown to be a good predictive test for spontaneous preterm birth (PTB) in symptomatic singleton pregnancy with threatened preterm labor (PTL). The aim of this review and meta-analysis of individual participant data was to evaluate the effect of knowledge of the TVS cervical length (CL) in preventing PTB in singleton pregnancies presenting with threatened PTL. MethodsWe searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register and the Cochrane Complementary Medicine Field's Trials Register (May 2016) and reference lists of retrieved studies. Selection criteria included randomized controlled trials of singleton gestations with threatened PTL randomized to management based mainly on CL screening (intervention group), or CL screening with no knowledge of results or no CL screening (control group). Participants included women with singleton gestations at 23 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks with threatened PTL. We contacted corresponding authors of included trials to request access to the data and perform a meta-analysis of individual participant data. Data provided by the investigators were merged into a master database constructed specifically for the review. The primary outcome was PTB < 37 weeks. Summary measures were reported as relative risk (RR) or as mean difference (MD) with 95% CI. ResultsThree trials including a total of 287 singleton gestations with threatened PTL between 24 + 0 and 35 + 6 weeks were included in the meta-analysis, of which 145 were randomized to CL screening with knowledge of results and 142 to no knowledge of CL. Compared with the control group, women who were randomized to the known CL group had a significantly lower rate of PTB < 37 weeks (22.1% vs 34.5%; RR, 0.64 (95% CI, 0.44-0.94); three trials; 287 participants) and a later gestational age at delivery (MD, 0.64 (95% CI, 0.03-1.25) weeks; MD, 4.48 (95% CI, 1.18-8.98) days; three trials; 287 participants). All other outcomes for which there were available data were similar in the two groups. ConclusionsThere is a significant association between knowledge of TVS CL and lower incidence of PTB and later gestational age at delivery in symptomatic singleton gestations with threatened PTL. Given that in the meta-analysis we found a significant 36% reduction in the primary outcome, but other outcomes were mostly statistically similar, further study needs to be undertaken to understand better whether the predictive characteristics of CL screening by TVS can be translated into better clinical management and therefore better outcomes and under what circumstances. Copyright (c) 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:322 / U34
页数:9
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Targeted therapy for threatened preterm labor based on sonographic measurement of the cervical length: a randomized controlled trial
    Alfirevic, Z.
    Allen-Coward, H.
    Molina, F.
    Vinuesa, C. P.
    Nicolaides, K.
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 29 (01) : 47 - 50
  • [2] [Anonymous], ULTRASOUND OBSTET GY
  • [3] [Anonymous], OBSTET EVIDENCE BASE
  • [4] [Anonymous], COCHRANE DATABASE SY
  • [5] Cervical sonography in women with symptoms of preterm labor
    Berghella, V
    Ness, A
    Bega, G
    Berghella, M
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2005, 32 (03) : 383 - +
  • [7] Hamilton Brady E Ph D, 2015, Natl Vital Stat Rep, V64, P1
  • [8] Transabdominal evaluation of uterine cervical length during pregnancy fails to identify a substantial number of women with a short cervix
    Hernandez-Andrade, Edgar
    Romero, Roberto
    Ahn, Hyunyoung
    Hussein, Youssef
    Yeo, Lami
    Korzeniewski, Steven J.
    Chaiworapongsa, Tinnakorn
    Hassan, Sonia S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2012, 25 (09) : 1682 - 1689
  • [9] EVALUATION OF THE WEEKLY CERVICAL EXAMINATION IN A PRETERM BIRTH PREVENTION PROGRAM
    HOLBROOK, RH
    FALCON, J
    HERRON, M
    LIRETTE, M
    LAROS, RK
    CREASY, RK
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 1987, 4 (03) : 240 - 244
  • [10] LENIHAN JP, 1984, OBSTET GYNECOL, V63, P33