An International Comparison of Carbon Dioxide Emission Performance Using the Nonparametric Metafrontier Approach

被引:0
作者
Wang, Qunwei [1 ,3 ]
Zhou, Peng [3 ]
Ge, Shilong [2 ,3 ]
Zhao, Zengyao [1 ]
机构
[1] Soochow Univ, Sch Business, 50 Donghuan Rd, Suzhou 215021, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Finance & Econ, Coll Management Sci & Engn, Nanjing 210046, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Res Ctr Soft Energy Sci, Nanjing 211106, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
来源
POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES | 2014年 / 23卷 / 03期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
carbon dioxide; emission performance; metafrontier function; DEA; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; CO2; EMISSIONS; TECHNOLOGY GAPS; DECOMPOSITION; CHINA; PRODUCTIVITY; INTENSITY; INDEX;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Cross-country assessment of carbon dioxide (CO2) emission performance provides quantitative information for determining the responsibility of various countries in reducing global CO2 emissions. This paper proposes a nonparametric metafrontier approach to evaluating the CO2 emission performance of 49 major emitting countries. It has been found that the CO2 emission performance of different countries shows a large discrepancy and the performance level of the group frontier is higher than that of the metafrontier. These countries can be divided into three categories based on their performance levels of group frontier and metafrontier. American's CO2 emission performance is closest to the best practice of world countries. Although Asia is still further from the efficient frontier and its CO2 reduction potential is the highest, the gap has narrowed over time. The technology gap of the sample countries in CO2 emission performance has experienced two stages of decrease and increase.
引用
收藏
页码:923 / 931
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Inter-regional comparisons of energy-related CO2 emissions using the decomposition technique [J].
Ang, BW ;
Zhang, FQ .
ENERGY, 1999, 24 (04) :297-305
[2]   Boundary problem in carbon emission decomposition [J].
Ang, BW ;
Choi, KH .
ENERGY POLICY, 2002, 30 (13) :1201-1205
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1973, J ECON HIST, DOI DOI 10.1017/S002205070007683X
[4]   CO2 emissions, energy usage, and output in Central America [J].
Apergis, Nicholas ;
Payne, James E. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (08) :3282-3286
[5]   A metafrontier production function for estimation of technical efficiencies and technology gaps for firms operating under different technologies [J].
Battese, GE ;
Rao, DSP ;
O'Donnell, CJ .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2004, 21 (01) :91-103
[6]  
Battese GE., 2002, International Journal of Business and Economics, V1, P87
[7]   MEASURING THE EFFICIENCY OF DECISION-MAKING UNITS [J].
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW ;
RHODES, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1979, 3 (04) :339-339
[8]  
Chiu YH, 2013, POL J ENVIRON STUD, V22, P653
[9]   The analysis of Taiwanese bank efficiency: Incorporating both external environment risk and internal risk [J].
Chiu, Yung-Ho ;
Chen, Yu-Chuan .
ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2009, 26 (02) :456-463
[10]   Productivity and undesirable outputs: A directional distance function approach [J].
Chung, YH ;
Fare, R ;
Grosskopf, S .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1997, 51 (03) :229-240