Hemispheric Differences in Frontal and Parietal Influences on Human Occipital Cortex: Direct Confirmation with Concurrent TMS-fMRI

被引:114
作者
Ruff, Christian C. [1 ]
Blankenburg, Felix [1 ]
Bjoertomt, Otto [1 ]
Bestmann, Sven [1 ]
Weiskopf, Nikolaus [1 ]
Driver, Jon [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Inst Cognit Neurosci, London WC1 3AR, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会; 英国惠康基金;
关键词
TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; HUMAN VISUAL-CORTEX; EYE-FIELD; TOP-DOWN; SPATIAL ATTENTION; FUNCTIONAL MRI; BRAIN ACTIVITY; AREAS; MICROSTIMULATION;
D O I
10.1162/jocn.2009.21097
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
We used concurrent TMS-fMRI to test directly for hemispheric differences in causal influences of the right or left fronto-parietal cortex on activity (BOLD signal) in the human occipital cortex. Clinical data and some behavioral TMS studies have been taken to suggest right-hemisphere specialization for top-down modulation of vision in humans, based on deficits such as spatial neglect or extinction in lesioned patients, or findings that TMS to right (vs. left) fronto-parietal structures can elicit stronger effects on visual performance. But prior to the recent advent of concurrent TMS and neuroimaging, it was not possible to directly examine the causal impact of one (stimulated) brain region upon others in humans. Here we stimulated the frontal or intraparietal cortex in the left or right hemisphere with TMS, inside an MR scanner, while measuring with fMRI any resulting BOLD signal changes in visual areas V1-V4 and V5/MT+. For both frontal and parietal stimulation, we found clear differences between effects of right-versus left-hemisphere TMS on activity in the visual cortex, with all differences significant in direct statistical comparisons. Frontal TMS over either hemisphere elicited similar BOLD decreases for central visual field representations in V1-V4, but only right frontal TMS led to BOLD increases for peripheral field representations in these regions. Hemispheric differences for effects of parietal TMS were even more marked: Right parietal TMS led to strong BOLD changes in V1-V4 and V5/MT+, but left parietal TMS did not. These data directly confirm that the human frontal and parietal cortex show right-hemisphere specialization for causal influences on the visual cortex.
引用
收藏
页码:1146 / 1161
页数:16
相关论文
共 87 条
  • [1] Modeling geometric deformations in EPI time series
    Andersson, JLR
    Hutton, C
    Ashburner, J
    Turner, R
    Friston, K
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2001, 13 (05) : 903 - 919
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1995, BRAIN ASYMMETRY
  • [3] Rapid enhancement of visual cortical response discriminability by microstimulation of the frontal eye field
    Armstrong, Katherine M.
    Moore, Tirin
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2007, 104 (22) : 9499 - 9504
  • [4] Prefrontal modulation of visual processing in humans
    Barceló, F
    Suwazono, S
    Knight, RT
    [J]. NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, 3 (04) : 399 - 403
  • [5] Functional MRI of cortical activations induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)
    Baudewig, J
    Siebner, HR
    Bestmann, S
    Tergau, F
    Tings, T
    Paulus, W
    Frahm, J
    [J]. NEUROREPORT, 2001, 12 (16) : 3543 - 3548
  • [6] Incidence of visual extinction after left versus right hemisphere stroke
    Becker, Elisabeth
    Karnath, Hans-Otto
    [J]. STROKE, 2007, 38 (12) : 3172 - 3174
  • [7] BESTMANN S, 2007, CEREB CORTEX, V26, P7452
  • [8] Bestmann S. R., 2008, OXFORD HDB TRANSCRAN, P569
  • [9] Location of the human frontal eye field as defined by electrical cortical stimulation: anatomical, functional and electrophysiological characteristics
    Blanke, O
    Spinelli, L
    Thut, G
    Michel, CM
    Perrig, S
    Landis, T
    Seeck, M
    [J]. NEUROREPORT, 2000, 11 (09) : 1907 - 1913
  • [10] VISUAL RECEPTIVE-FIELD ORGANIZATION AND CORTICO-CORTICAL CONNECTIONS OF THE LATERAL INTRAPARIETAL AREA (AREA LIP) IN THE MACAQUE
    BLATT, GJ
    ANDERSEN, RA
    STONER, GR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, 1990, 299 (04) : 421 - 445