Endorectal MRI for prediction of tumor site, tumor size, and local extension of prostate cancer

被引:128
作者
Nakashima, J
Tanimoto, A
Imai, Y
Mukai, M
Horiguchi, Y
Nakagawa, K
Oya, M
Ohigashi, T
Marumo, K
Murai, M
机构
[1] Keio Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo 1608582, Japan
[2] Keio Univ, Sch Med, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Tokyo 1608582, Japan
[3] Tokai Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Kanagawa 2591100, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2004.02.036
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. To assess the value of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detecting the tumor site, tumor size, and disease extent in patients with localized prostate cancer. Methods. The MRI findings were compared with the histopathologic findings of radical prostatectomy specimens in 95 patients. Results. The histologic examination revealed 186 cancer foci. Endorectal MRI detected 109 cancer foci. The accuracy, sensitivity, and positive predictive value of endorectal MRI for detecting tumor foci greater than 1.0 cm in diameter was 79.8%, 85.3%, and 92.6%, respectively; the corresponding value for detecting tumor foci smaller than 1.0 cm was 24.2%, 26.2%, and 75.9%, respectively. The maximal tumor diameter on endorectal MRI correlated with that shown by histologic examination for tumors larger than 1.0 cm in diameter. However, it did not correlate significantly with the histologic diameter of tumors smaller than 1.0 cm. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of endorectal MRI was 74.7%, 57.1%, 82.1%, 57.1%, and 82.1%, respectively, for the detection of extracapsular extension and was 75.8%, 62.1%, 81.8%, 60.0%, and 83.1%, respectively, for local staging. Conclusions. The results of the present study suggest that endorectal MRI is useful for predicting local extension, as well as tumor site and tumor size, of cancer foci greater than 1.0 cm in diameter. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 105
页数:5
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Bartolozzi C, 1996, EUR RADIOL, V6, P339
  • [2] USE OF ENDORECTAL SURFACE COIL MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING FOR LOCAL STAGING OF PROSTATE-CANCER
    CHELSKY, MJ
    SCHNALL, MD
    SEIDMON, EJ
    POLLACK, HM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1993, 150 (02) : 391 - 395
  • [3] Prostate cancer tumor volume: Measurement with endorectal MR and MR spectroscopic imaging
    Coakley, FV
    Kurhanewicz, J
    Lu, Y
    Jones, KD
    Swanson, MG
    Chang, SD
    Carroll, PR
    Hricak, H
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2002, 223 (01) : 91 - 97
  • [4] Combined modality staging of prostate carcinoma and its utility in predicting pathologic stage and postoperative prostate specific antigen failure
    DAmico, AV
    Whittington, R
    Malkowicz, SB
    Schultz, D
    Schnall, M
    Tomaszewski, JE
    Wein, A
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1997, 49 (3A) : 23 - 30
  • [5] A COMPARISON OF THE MORPHOLOGICAL FEATURES OF CANCER ARISING IN THE TRANSITION ZONE AND IN THE PERIPHERAL ZONE OF THE PROSTATE
    GREENE, DR
    WHEELER, TM
    EGAWA, S
    DUNN, JK
    SCARDINO, PT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1991, 146 (04) : 1069 - 1076
  • [6] CARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE-GLAND - MR-IMAGING WITH PELVIC PHASED-ARRAY COILS VERSUS INTEGRATED ENDORECTAL PELVIC PHASED-ARRAY COILS
    HRICAK, H
    WHITE, S
    VIGNERON, D
    KURHANEWICZ, J
    KOSCO, A
    LEVIN, D
    WEISS, J
    NARAYAN, P
    CARROLL, PR
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1994, 193 (03) : 703 - 709
  • [7] HUCH BR, 1995, CLIN RAD, V50, P593
  • [8] Magnetic resonance imaging of clinically localized prostatic cancer
    Ikonen, S
    Kärkkäinen, P
    Kivisaari, L
    Salo, JO
    Taari, K
    Vehmas, T
    Tervahartiala, P
    Rannikko, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 159 (03) : 915 - 919
  • [9] Ikonen S, 2000, PROSTATE, V43, P43, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0045(20000401)43:1<43::AID-PROS6>3.0.CO
  • [10] 2-S