Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: Randomized trial in a population-based screening program - The Oslo II study

被引:163
作者
Skaane, P [1 ]
Skjennald, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Ullevaal Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Breast Imaging Ctr, N-0407 Oslo, Norway
关键词
breast neoplasms; radiography; breast radiography; comparative studies; cancer screening; digital;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2321031624
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To prospectively compare cancer detection rates, recall rates, and positive predictive values at screen-film mammography (SFM) with those at full-field digital mammography (FFDM) with soft-copy reading in a population-based screening program in Norway. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 43,429 women invited, 25,263 women aged 45-69 years attended the screening program and were randomized with adjustments for age and area of residence, to undergo SFM or FFDM. Two standard views of each breast were acquired. Independent double reading was performed with use of a five-point rating scale for probability of cancer. Recall rates, positive predictive values, and cancer detection rates were compared for two age groups (45-49 and 50-69 years) by using the chi(2) test. RESULTS: Overall, 73 cancers. in 17,911 women were detected at SFM (detection rate, 0.41%), compared with 41 cancers in 6,997 women at FFDM (detection rate, 0.59%; P = .06). In the group aged 50-69 years, 56 cancers in 10, 304 women wore detected at SFM (detection rate, 0.54%), compared with 33 cancers in 3,985, at FFDM (detection rate, 0.83%); the difference in cancer detection rates, approached significance (P = .053). In the group aged 45-49 years, 17 cancers in 7,60 Women, were detected at SFM (detection rate, 0.22%), compared with eight cancers in 3,012 at FFDM (detection rate, 0.27%). Recall rates in both age groups were significantly higher at FFDM than at SFM (P < .05), but positive predictive value was not significantly different. CONCLUSION: FFDM allowed a higher cancer detection rate than did SFM in the group aged 50-69, although the difference did not reach statistical significance. The detection rate Was nearly equal for the two modalities in the group aged 45-49. SFM and FFDM with soft-copy reading are comparable techniques for population-based screening mammography programs. (C) RSNA, 2004.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 204
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Performance comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography in clinical practice
    Berns, EA
    Hendrick, RE
    Cutter, GR
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (05) : 830 - 834
  • [2] Bjurstam N, 1997, CANCER, V80, P2091, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19971201)80:11<2091::AID-CNCR8>3.0.CO
  • [3] 2-#
  • [4] The influence of previous films on screening mammographic interpretation and detection of breast carcinoma
    Callaway, MP
    Boggis, CRM
    Astley, SA
    Hutt, I
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1997, 52 (07) : 527 - 529
  • [5] Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of double reading of mammograms in breast cancer screening: findings of a systematic review
    Dinnes, J
    Moss, S
    Melia, J
    Blanks, R
    Song, F
    Kleijnen, J
    [J]. BREAST, 2001, 10 (06) : 455 - 463
  • [6] Feig SA, 2001, IWDM 2000: 5TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, P451
  • [7] Comparative study in patients with microcalcifications: full-field digital mammography vs screen-film mammography
    Fischer, U
    Baum, F
    Obenauer, S
    Luftner-Nagel, S
    von Heyden, D
    Vosshenrich, R
    Grabbe, E
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (11) : 2679 - 2683
  • [8] Performance of screening mammography among women with and without a first-degree relative with breast cancer
    Kerlikowske, K
    Carney, PA
    Geller, B
    Mandelson, MT
    Taplin, SH
    Malvin, K
    Ernster, V
    Urban, N
    Cutter, G
    Rosenberg, R
    Ballard-Barbash, R
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2000, 133 (11) : 855 - 863
  • [9] Effects of ambient light and view box luminance on the detection of calcifications in mammography
    KimmeSmith, C
    Haus, AG
    DeBruhl, N
    Bassett, LW
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 168 (03) : 775 - 778
  • [10] Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography of breast cancer
    Lewin, JM
    D'Orsi, CJ
    Hendrick, RE
    Moss, LJ
    Isaacs, PK
    Karellas, A
    Cutter, GR
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 179 (03) : 671 - 677