Comparing measures of model selection for penalized splines in Cox models

被引:34
作者
Malloy, Elizabeth J. [1 ]
Spiegelman, Donna [2 ,3 ]
Eisen, Ellen A. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] American Univ, Dept Math & Stat, Washington, DC 20016 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Univ Calif Berkeley, Sch Publ Hlth, Berkeley, CA 94704 USA
关键词
SMOOTHING PARAMETER SELECTION; DOSE-RESPONSE; METALWORKING FLUIDS; POOLED ANALYSIS; EXPOSURE; CANCER; RISK; REGRESSION; MORTALITY; COHORT;
D O I
10.1016/j.csda.2008.12.008
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This article presents an application and a simulation study of model fit criteria for selecting the optimal degree of smoothness for penalized splines in Cox models. The criteria considered were the Akaike information criterion, the corrected AIC, two formulations of the Bayesian information criterion, and a generalized cross-validation method. The estimated curves selected by the five methods were compared to each other in a study of rectal cancer mortality in autoworkers. In the stimulation study, we estimated the fit of the penalized spline models in six exposure-response scenarios, using the five model fit criteria. The methods were compared on the basis of a mean squared error score and the power and size of hypothesis tests for any effect and for detecting nonlinearity. All comparisons were made across a range in the total sample size and number of cases. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2605 / 2616
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Prostate cancer incidence in relation to time windows of exposure to metalworking fluids in the auto industry
    Agalliu, I
    Kriebel, D
    Quinn, MM
    Wegman, DH
    Eisen, EA
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 16 (05) : 664 - 671
  • [2] Akaike H., 1973, 2 INT S INFORM THEOR, P267
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1978, A Practical Guide to Splines
  • [4] Generating survival times to simulate Cox proportional hazards models
    Bender, R
    Augustin, T
    Blettner, M
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2005, 24 (11) : 1713 - 1723
  • [5] Breslow N. E., 1987, STAT METHODS CANC RE, V2
  • [6] Burnham KP., 1998, MODEL SELECTION MULT
  • [7] Casella George, 2021, Statistical inference
  • [8] TCDD exposure-response analysis and risk assessment
    Cheng, Hong
    Aylward, Lesa
    Beall, Colleen
    Starr, Thomas B.
    Brunet, Robert C.
    Carrier, Gaetan
    Delzell, Elizabeth
    [J]. RISK ANALYSIS, 2006, 26 (04) : 1059 - 1071
  • [9] Dairy foods, calcium, and colorectal cancer: A pooled analysis of 10 cohort studies
    Cho, E
    Smith-Warner, SA
    Spiegelman, D
    Beeson, WL
    van den Brandt, PA
    Colditz, GA
    Folsom, AR
    Fraser, GE
    Freudenheim, JL
    Giovannucci, E
    Goldbohm, RA
    Graham, S
    Miller, AB
    Pietinen, P
    Potter, JD
    Rohan, TE
    Terry, P
    Toniolo, P
    Virtanen, MJ
    Willett, WC
    Wolk, A
    Wu, K
    Yaun, SS
    Zeleniuch-Jacquotte, A
    Hunter, DJ
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2004, 96 (13): : 1015 - 1022
  • [10] COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187