Collaborative research projects in the technology-enhanced language classroom: Pre-service and in-service teachers exchange knowledge about technology

被引:29
作者
Schmid, Euline Cutrim [1 ]
Hegelheimer, Volker [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Educ Schwabisch Gmund, Schwabisch Gmund, Germany
[2] Iowa State Univ, Iowa City, IA USA
关键词
teacher education; reflective practice; situated learning; teacher cognition; EDUCATION; CALL;
D O I
10.1017/S0958344014000135
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This paper presents research findings of a longitudinal empirical case study that investigated an innovative Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL) professional development program for pre-service English as Foreign Language (EFL) teachers. The conceptualization of the program was based on the assumption that pre-service language teachers learn better in situated contexts (Egbert, 2006). Therefore, a key component of the program was the development of school-based research projects, in which the student teachers needed to design, implement, and evaluate technology-enhanced EFL lessons in collaboration with in-service teachers. Data were collected via field notes, video recordings of lessons, academic research reports produced by the pre-service teachers, and in-depth interviews with the pre-service and in-service teachers. Our findings indicate that the field experiences provided professional learning opportunities that supported the student teachers' development as CALL practitioners. The participating pre-service teachers especially emphasized the important role played by school-based experiences in allowing them to use technology in authentic language teaching scenarios and to evaluate the impact of technology on language teaching and learning. The paper concludes with a discussion of important principles and guidelines that should underlie and inform such collaborative efforts and a summary of the implications of the findings for the design of CALL pre-service teacher education programs.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 332
页数:18
相关论文
共 30 条
[21]  
Hubbard P., 2006, TEACHER ED CALL
[22]  
Legutke M., 2007, Kluwer handbook on English language teaching, P1125
[23]  
Legutke MK, 2009, CAMBRIDGE GUIDE TO SECOND LANGUAGE TEACHER EDUCATION, P209
[24]  
Meskill C., 2002, LANGUAGE LEARNING TE, V6, P46
[25]  
Meskill C, 2006, LANG LEARN LANG TEAC, V14, P283
[26]   Teaching Assistants' Self-Efficacy in Teaching Literature: Sources, Personal Assessments, and Consequences [J].
Mills, Nicole .
MODERN LANGUAGE JOURNAL, 2011, 95 (01) :61-80
[27]  
Roberts J., 1998, Language teacher education
[28]   Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching [J].
Shulman, Lee S. .
PROFESORADO-REVISTA DE CURRICULUM Y FORMACION DE PROFESORADO, 2019, 23 (03) :269-295
[29]  
Tarone E, 2005, SECOND LANGUAGE TEACHER EDUCATION: INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVES, P5
[30]  
Wallace M.J., 1991, TRAINING FOREIGN LAN