Methodological issues arising from systematic reviews of the evidence of safety of vaccines

被引:16
|
作者
Price, D [1 ]
Jefferson, T [1 ]
Demicheli, V [1 ]
机构
[1] Cochrane Vaccines Field & Hlth Reviews Ltd, Cochrane Ctr, Oxford OX2 7LG, England
关键词
vaccine safety; adverse event; systematic review; methodology;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.01.009
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Adaptations to the recognized methods of systematic reviewing are required when addressing questions about safety, particularly about rare and/or long-term serious adverse events. Conducting a systematic review of vaccine safety requires the implementation of novel strategies for locating studies, the use of experimental instruments to assess the quality of non-randomized studies, and the employment of pooling methods for non-randomized data, where appropriate. Standardizing both the indexing of adverse event data on electronic libraries and their reporting would improve the potential of systematic reviews of vaccine to draw accurate conclusions about the safety of a vaccine. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2080 / 2084
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evidence on multimorbidity from definition to intervention: An overview of systematic reviews
    Xu, Xiaolin
    Mishra, Gita D.
    Jones, Mark
    AGEING RESEARCH REVIEWS, 2017, 37 : 53 - 68
  • [42] From standard systematic reviews to living systematic reviews
    Breuer, Claudia
    Meerpohl, Joerg J.
    Siemens, Waldemar
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2023, 176 : 76 - 81
  • [43] Issues in conducting and disseminating brief reviews of evidence
    Abrami, Philip C.
    Borokhovski, Eugene
    Bernard, Robert M.
    Wade, C. Anne
    Tamim, Rana
    Persson, Tonje
    Bethel, Edward Clement
    Hanz, Katherine
    Surkes, Michael A.
    EVIDENCE & POLICY, 2010, 6 (03): : 371 - 389
  • [44] Evaluation of AMSTAR to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions
    Michelle Pollock
    Ricardo M. Fernandes
    Lisa Hartling
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 17
  • [45] Evaluation of AMSTAR to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions
    Pollock, Michelle
    Fernandes, Ricardo M.
    Hartling, Lisa
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2017, 17 : 48
  • [46] Methodological quality and outcome of systematic reviews reporting on orthopaedic treatment for class III malocclusion: Overview of systematic reviews
    Jamilian, Abdolreza
    Cannavale, Rosangela
    Piancino, Maria Grazia
    Eslami, Sara
    Perillo, Letizia
    JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2016, 43 (02) : 102 - 120
  • [47] The implications of biomarker evidence for systematic reviews
    Choong, Miew Keen
    Tsafnat, Guy
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2012, 12
  • [48] Meditation: Evidence Map of Systematic Reviews
    Schlechta Portella, Caio Fabio
    Ghelman, Ricardo
    Abdala, Veronica
    Schveitzer, Mariana Cabral
    Afonso, Rui Ferreira
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 9
  • [49] Teledermatology: an evidence map of systematic reviews
    Chow, Aloysius
    Smith, Helen Elizabeth
    Car, Lorainne Tudor
    Kong, Jing Wen
    Choo, Kay Wee
    Aw, Angeline Ai Ling
    Wong, Marie Ann Mae En
    Apfelbacher, Christian
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2024, 13 (01)
  • [50] Methodological evaluation of systematic reviews based on the use of artificial intelligence systems in chest radiography
    Vidal-Mondejar, J.
    Tejedor-Romero, L.
    Catala-Lopez, F.
    RADIOLOGIA, 2024, 66 (04): : 326 - 339