Methodological issues arising from systematic reviews of the evidence of safety of vaccines

被引:16
|
作者
Price, D [1 ]
Jefferson, T [1 ]
Demicheli, V [1 ]
机构
[1] Cochrane Vaccines Field & Hlth Reviews Ltd, Cochrane Ctr, Oxford OX2 7LG, England
关键词
vaccine safety; adverse event; systematic review; methodology;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.01.009
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Adaptations to the recognized methods of systematic reviewing are required when addressing questions about safety, particularly about rare and/or long-term serious adverse events. Conducting a systematic review of vaccine safety requires the implementation of novel strategies for locating studies, the use of experimental instruments to assess the quality of non-randomized studies, and the employment of pooling methods for non-randomized data, where appropriate. Standardizing both the indexing of adverse event data on electronic libraries and their reporting would improve the potential of systematic reviews of vaccine to draw accurate conclusions about the safety of a vaccine. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2080 / 2084
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Systematic reviews of clinical practice guidelines: a methodological guide
    Johnston, Amy
    Kelly, Shannon E.
    Hsieh, Shu-Ching
    Skidmore, Becky
    Wells, George A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 108 : 64 - 76
  • [32] How are systematic reviews of prevalence conducted? A methodological study
    Celina Borges Migliavaca
    Cinara Stein
    Verônica Colpani
    Timothy Hugh Barker
    Zachary Munn
    Maicon Falavigna
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 20
  • [33] Replication of systematic reviews: is it to the benefit or detriment of methodological quality?
    Chapelle, Celine
    Ollier, Edouard
    Bonjean, Paul
    Locher, Clara
    Zufferey, Paul Jacques
    Cucherat, Michel
    Laporte, Silvy
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2023, 162 : 98 - 106
  • [34] Methodological guidance for the conduct of mixed methods systematic reviews
    Stern, Cindy
    Lizarondo, Lucylynn
    Carrier, Judith
    Godfrey, Christina
    Rieger, Kendra
    Salmond, Susan
    Apostolo, Joao
    Kirkpatrick, Pamela
    Loveday, Heather
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2020, 18 (10) : 2108 - 2118
  • [35] How are systematic reviews of prevalence conducted? A methodological study
    Borges Migliavaca, Celina
    Stein, Cinara
    Colpani, Veronica
    Barker, Timothy Hugh
    Munn, Zachary
    Falavigna, Maicon
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [36] The life and death of living systematic reviews: a methodological survey
    Akl, Elie A.
    El Khoury, Rayane
    Khamis, Assem M.
    El Mikati, Ibrahim K.
    Pardo-Hernandez, Hector
    Farran, Sarah
    Ibrahim, Rand
    Khamis, Mohamed
    Hneiny, Layal
    Schunemann, Holger J.
    Kahale, Lara A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2023, 156 : 11 - 21
  • [37] "Overviews" should meet the methodological standards of systematic reviews
    Kovacs, Francisco M.
    Urrutia, Gerard
    Alarcon, Jose Domingo
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2014, 23 (02) : 480 - 480
  • [38] Bioavailability of Oral Curcumin in Systematic Reviews: A Methodological Study
    Popovic, Viljemka Bucevic
    Farhat, Esma Karahmet
    Banjari, Ines
    Kadic, Antonia Jelicic
    Puljak, Livia
    PHARMACEUTICALS, 2024, 17 (02)
  • [39] Methodological guidance for the conduct of mixed methods systematic reviews
    Stern, Cindy
    Lizarondo, Lucylynn
    Carrier, Judith
    Godfrey, Christina
    Rieger, Kendra
    Salmond, Susan
    Apostolo, Joao
    Kirkpatrick, Pamela
    Loveday, Heather
    JBI EVIDENCE IMPLEMENTATION, 2021, 19 (02): : 120 - 129
  • [40] Causal assessment in evidence synthesis: A methodological review of reviews
    Shimonovich, Michal
    Pearce, Anna
    Thomson, Hilary
    Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal
    RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2022, 13 (04) : 405 - 423