Methodological issues arising from systematic reviews of the evidence of safety of vaccines

被引:16
|
作者
Price, D [1 ]
Jefferson, T [1 ]
Demicheli, V [1 ]
机构
[1] Cochrane Vaccines Field & Hlth Reviews Ltd, Cochrane Ctr, Oxford OX2 7LG, England
关键词
vaccine safety; adverse event; systematic review; methodology;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.01.009
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Adaptations to the recognized methods of systematic reviewing are required when addressing questions about safety, particularly about rare and/or long-term serious adverse events. Conducting a systematic review of vaccine safety requires the implementation of novel strategies for locating studies, the use of experimental instruments to assess the quality of non-randomized studies, and the employment of pooling methods for non-randomized data, where appropriate. Standardizing both the indexing of adverse event data on electronic libraries and their reporting would improve the potential of systematic reviews of vaccine to draw accurate conclusions about the safety of a vaccine. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2080 / 2084
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Methodological quality of systematic reviews on Chinese herbal medicine: a methodological survey
    Cheung, Andy K. L.
    Wong, Charlene H. L.
    Ho, Leonard
    Wu, Irene X. Y.
    Ke, Fiona Y. T.
    Chung, Vincent C. H.
    BMC COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE AND THERAPIES, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [22] Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews Addressing Orthodontic Interventions: Methodological Study
    Notaro, Sarah Queiroz
    Hermont, Ana Paula
    Cruz, Poliana Valdelice
    Maia, Raiane Machado
    Avila, Walesca Melo
    Pericic, Tina Poklepovic
    Abreu, Lucas Guimaraes
    Jiao, Ruimin
    Martins-Pfeifer, Carolina Castro
    PESQUISA BRASILEIRA EM ODONTOPEDIATRIA E CLINICA INTEGRADA, 2024, 24
  • [23] A methodological review of systematic literature reviews in higher education: Heterogeneity and homogeneity
    Chen, Yulu
    Chong, Sin Wang
    Lin, Ting Jun
    EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH REVIEW, 2022, 35
  • [24] Reporting and methodological quality of COVID-19 systematic reviews needs to be improved: an evidence mapping
    Li, Yanfei
    Cao, Liujiao
    Zhang, Ziyao
    Hou, Liangying
    Qin, Yu
    Hui, Xu
    Li, Jing
    Zhao, Haitong
    Cui, Gecheng
    Cui, Xudong
    Li, Rui
    Lin, Qingling
    Li, Xiuxia
    Yang, Kehu
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 135 : 17 - 28
  • [25] Evaluating the evidence: a systematic review of reviews of the effectiveness and safety of digital interventions for ADHD
    Elia Gabarron
    Kerstin Denecke
    Guillermo Lopez-Campos
    BMC Psychiatry, 25 (1)
  • [26] Methodological Quality of Economic Evaluations in Integrated Care: Evidence from a Systematic Review
    Kadu, Mudathira
    Ehrenberg, Nieves
    Stein, Viktoria
    Tsiachristas, Apostolos
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE, 2019, 19 (03):
  • [27] Issues of comorbidity in clinical guidelines and systematic reviews from a rehabilitation perspective
    Meyer, Thorsten
    Wulff, Kolja
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2019, 55 (03) : 364 - 371
  • [28] Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews in radiation oncology: A systematic review
    Hasan, Haroon
    Muhammed, Taaha
    Yu, Jennifer
    Taguchi, Kelsi
    Samargandi, Osama A.
    Howard, A. Fuchsia
    Lo, Andrea C.
    Olson, Robert
    Goddard, Karen
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 50 : 141 - 149
  • [29] Checklists of methodological issues for review authors to consider when including non-randomized studies in systematic reviews
    Wells, George A.
    Shea, Beverley
    Higgins, Julian P. T.
    Sterne, Jonathan
    Tugwell, Peter
    Reeves, Barnaby C.
    RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2013, 4 (01) : 63 - 77
  • [30] “Overviews” should meet the methodological standards of systematic reviews
    Francisco M. Kovacs
    Gerard Urrútia
    José Domingo Alarcón
    European Spine Journal, 2014, 23 : 480 - 480