Automatic Generation Control of Multi-area Power System with Network Constraints and Communication Delays

被引:0
作者
Patel, Ragini [1 ]
Meegahapola, Lasantha [1 ]
Wang, Liuping [1 ]
Yu, Xinghuo [1 ]
McGrath, Brendan [1 ]
机构
[1] RMIT Univ, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia
关键词
Automatic generation control; Delays; Frequency control; Economics; Steady-state; Power system dynamics; constraints; distributed control; frequency regulation; model predictive control (MPC); tie-lines; MODEL-PREDICTIVE CONTROL; LOAD FREQUENCY CONTROL; OPTIMIZATION; CHALLENGES; STRATEGIES; STABILITY;
D O I
10.35833/mpce.2018.000513
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Newly proposed power system control methodologies combine economic dispatch (ED) and automatic generation control (AGC) to achieve the steady-state cost-optimal solution under stochastic operation conditions. However, a real power system is subjected to continuous demand disturbance and system constraints due to the input saturation, communication delays and unmeasurable feed-forward load disturbances. Therefore, optimizing the dynamic response under practical conditions is equally important. This paper proposes a state constrained distributed model predictive control (SCDMPC) scheme for the optimal frequency regulation of an interconnected power system under actual operation conditions, which exist due to the governor saturation, generation rate constraints (GRCs), communication delays, and unmeasured feed-forward load disturbances. In addition, it proposes an algorithm to handle the solution infeasibility within the SCDMPC scheme, when the input and state constraints are conflicting. The proposed SCDMPC scheme is then tested with numerical studies on a three-area interconnected network. The results show that the proposed scheme gives better control and cost performance for both steady state and dynamic state in comparison to the traditional distributed model predictive control (MPC) schemes.
引用
收藏
页码:454 / 463
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Abedinia O., 2012, 2012 11th International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering, P473, DOI 10.1109/EEEIC.2012.6221424
[2]  
Ackermann T, 2005, WIND POWER IN POWER SYSTEMS, P1, DOI 10.1002/0470012684
[3]  
Afonso R. J., 2012, INFEASIBILITY HANDLI
[4]   Smart Grid: Overview, Issues and Opportunities. Advances and Challenges in Sensing, Modeling, Simulation, Optimization and Control [J].
Amin, S. Massoud .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CONTROL, 2011, 17 (5-6) :547-567
[5]   Stochastic security for operations planning with significant wind power generation [J].
Bouffard, Francois ;
Galiana, Francisco D. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2008, 23 (02) :306-316
[6]  
Changhong Zhao, 2016, 2016 Power Systems Computation Conference (PSCC), P1, DOI 10.1109/PSCC.2016.7541028
[7]   Model Predictive Load-Frequency Control [J].
Ersdal, Anne Mai ;
Imsland, Lars ;
Uhlen, Kjetil .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2016, 31 (01) :777-785
[8]  
Garnier H, 2008, ADV IND CONTROL, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-1-84800-161-9
[9]   Assessment of non-centralised model predictive control techniques for electrical power networks [J].
Hermans, Ralph M. ;
Jokic, Andrej ;
Lazar, Mircea ;
Alessio, Alessandro ;
van den Bosch, Paul P. J. ;
Hiskens, Ian A. ;
Bemporad, Alberto .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTROL, 2012, 85 (08) :1162-1177
[10]  
Holttinen H, 2006, DESIGN OPERATION POW