Semantic domain and grammatical class effects in the picture-word interference paradigm

被引:4
|
作者
Rodriguez-Ferreiro, Javier [1 ,2 ]
Davies, Robert [3 ]
Cuetos, Fernando [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Barcelona, Dept Psicol Basica, Barcelona 08035, Spain
[2] Univ Barcelona, IR3C, Barcelona 08035, Spain
[3] Oxford Brookes Univ, Dept Psychol, Fac Hlth & Life Sci, Oxford OX3 0BP, England
[4] Univ Oviedo, Fac Psicol, Oviedo 33003, Spain
关键词
semantic interference effect; grammatical class; verbs; action naming; picture word interference; SPREADING-ACTIVATION THEORY; SENTENCE PRODUCTION; LEXICAL SELECTION; SPEECH PRODUCTION; LEMMA RETRIEVAL; TIME-COURSE; VERBS; NOUNS; SIMILARITY; SET;
D O I
10.1080/01690965.2013.788195
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Grammatical effects in picture-word interference experiments have been argued to reflect grammatical constraints during lexicalisation. Alternative views hold that those effects derive from the coincidence of semantic and grammatical differences between candidates. We present three experiments conducted in Spanish. Semantic relatedness between target and distracters (related or unrelated), as well as grammatical class (nouns or verbs) and semantic domain (objects or actions) of the distracters were manipulated in infinitive or inflected action naming tasks. Whereas related action-words, but not object-nouns, produced longer reaction times irrespective of their grammatical class in the infinitive condition, only related verbs slowed latencies in the inflected condition. Our results suggest that speech production relies on the exclusion of candidate responses that do not fulfil task-pertinent criteria like membership in the appropriate semantic domain or grammatical class. Taken together, these findings are explained by a response-exclusion account of speech output. This and alternative hypotheses are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 135
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Set size and repetition in the picture-word interference paradigm: implications for models of naming
    Caramazza, A
    Costa, A
    COGNITION, 2001, 80 (03) : 291 - 298
  • [42] Age of acquisition, word frequency, and picture-word interference
    Catling, Jonathan C.
    Dent, Kevin
    Johnston, Robert A.
    Balding, Richard
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 63 (07): : 1304 - 1317
  • [43] Semantic interference in the picture-word interference task: Is there a pre-lexical, conceptual contribution to the effect?
    Jescheniak, Joerg D.
    Woehner, Stefan
    Bethcke, Hanna S.
    Beaupain, Marie C.
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2020, 27 (02) : 373 - 378
  • [44] Semantic Interference Effect in Picture-Word Naming Tasks between Youth and Elderly
    Kim, Oh-Hyun
    Choi, Soyoung
    Hwang, Mina
    COMMUNICATION SCIENCES AND DISORDERS-CSD, 2016, 21 (03): : 462 - 471
  • [45] Of Beavers and Tables: The Role of Animacy in the Processing of Grammatical Gender Within a Picture-Word Interference Task
    Sa-Leite, Ana Rita
    Haro, Juan
    Comesana, Montserrat
    Fraga, Isabel
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [46] Semantic interference in the picture-word interference task: Is there a pre-lexical, conceptual contribution to the effect?
    Jörg D. Jescheniak
    Stefan Wöhner
    Hanna S. Bethcke
    Marie C. Beaupain
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2020, 27 : 373 - 378
  • [47] The picture-word interference effect is not a Stroop effect
    R. Dell’Acqua
    R. Job
    F. Peressotti
    A. Pascali
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2007, 14 : 717 - 722
  • [48] The picture-word interference effect is not a Stroop effect
    Dell'Acqua, R.
    Job, R.
    Peressotti, F.
    Pascali, A.
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2007, 14 (04) : 717 - 722
  • [49] When more is less: A counterintuitive effect of distractor frequency in the picture-word interference paradigm
    Miozzo, M
    Caramazza, A
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2003, 132 (02) : 228 - 252
  • [50] Picture-word interference and the response exclusion hypothesis
    Mulatti, Claudio
    Coltheart, Max
    CORTEX, 2012, 48 (03) : 363 - 372