Rethinking symbolic racism: Evidence of attribution bias

被引:40
作者
Gomez, Brad T. [1 ]
Wilson, J. Matthew
机构
[1] Univ S Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
[2] So Methodist Univ, Dallas, TX 75275 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00449.x
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
This paper demonstrates that cognitive tendencies related to political sophistication produce an attribution bias in the widely accepted symbolic racism scale. When this bias is controlled statistically, the effect of symbolic racism on racial policy attitudes is greatly diminished. Our theory posits that high sophisticates tend to make global/distal attributions, allowing them to associate racial inequality with broader sociopolitical causes. Less sophisticated individuals, conversely, tend to make local/proximal attributions, thus biasing them against ascribing responsibility systemically. Consequently, less sophisticated individuals tend to be classified as intolerant by the symbolic racism scale, even when controlling for factors such as ideology and anti-black affect.
引用
收藏
页码:611 / 625
页数:15
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], BELIEFS INEQUALITY
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1988, ELIMINATING RACISM P
[3]   Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition [J].
Cacioppo, JT ;
Petty, RE ;
Feinstein, JA ;
Blair, W ;
Jarvis, G .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1996, 119 (02) :197-253
[4]  
Converse PE, 1964, IDEOLOGY DISCONTENT
[5]  
Delli Carpini MichaelX., 1993, AM J POLIT SCI, V37, P1179, DOI DOI 10.2307/2111549
[6]  
Delli Carpini MichaelX., 1996, What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters
[7]  
FEAGIN JR, 1972, PSYCHOL TODAY, V6, P101
[8]   The humanitarian foundation of public support for social welfare [J].
Feldman, S ;
Steenbergen, MR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2001, 45 (03) :658-677
[10]  
Fiske ST., 1991, SOC COGNITION