Initial and 3-year results after subintimal versus intraluminal approach for long femoropopliteal occlusion treated with a self-expandable nitinol stent

被引:39
作者
Soga, Yoshimitsu [1 ]
Iida, Osamu [2 ]
Suzuki, Kenji [3 ]
Hirano, Keisuke [4 ]
Kawasaki, Daizo [5 ]
Shintani, Yoshiaki [6 ]
Suematsu, Nobuhiro [7 ]
Yamaoka, Terutoshi [8 ]
机构
[1] Kokura Mem Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka 8020001, Japan
[2] Kansai Rosai Hosp, Ctr Cardiovasc, Amagasaki, Hyogo, Japan
[3] Sendai Kosei Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
[4] Yokohama City Eastern Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
[5] Hyogo Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, Div Cardiovasc, Nishinomiya, Hyogo 6638501, Japan
[6] Shin Koga Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan
[7] Fukuoka Red Cross Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Fukuoka, Japan
[8] Matsuyama Red Cross Hosp, Dept Vasc Surg, Matsuyama, Ehime, Japan
关键词
SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL-ARTERY; BALLOON ANGIOPLASTY; RECANALIZATION; IMPLANTATION; LESIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2013.05.107
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Intraluminal femoropopliteal stenting enables favorable dilation and good immediate results; however, whether this contributes to long-term patency is unclear. We compared patency after femoropopliteal stenting for a long occlusion using either an intraluminal or subintimal approach. Methods: Between January 2004 and December 2011, 902 endovascular procedures using either an intraluminal approach (651 procedures) or a subintimal approach (251 procedures) for long femoropopliteal occlusion were analyzed retrospectively. The outcomes of this study were periprocedural complication; primary, assisted-primary, and secondary patency; and overall survival. Results: The mean follow-up period of survivors was 29 6 16 months. Between the intraluminal and subintimal approach, technical success (91% vs 90%; P = .71) and periprocedural complications (11% vs 13%; P = .34) were similar. However, procedure time was significantly longer for the intraluminal approach (126 +/- 63 minutes vs 98 +/- 49 minutes; P = .003). The improvement of ankle-brachial index was also similar. A quarter of cases started with the intraluminal approach were switched to a subintimal approach. There was no significant difference in primary, assisted-primary and secondary patency at 3 years between the two groups (55% vs 53%; P = .30; 65% vs 74%; P = .11; and 80% vs 85%; P = .37). The 3-year overall survival also did not differ significantly between groups (84% vs 86%; P = .55). After adjusting for baseline differences, the subintimal approach was found to be similar to the intraluminal approach for primary patency (hazard ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.94-1.56; adjusted P = .14). Conclusions: Initial result and 3-year patency was similar in both approaches. Given the longer procedure time and high crossover rate, we suggest that a subintimal approach may be preferred in the treatment of long femoropopliteal occlusions with stenting.
引用
收藏
页码:1547 / 1555
页数:9
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] RECANALIZATION OF FEMORO-POPLITEAL OCCLUSIONS - IMPROVING SUCCESS RATE BY SUBINTIMAL RECANALIZATION
    BOLIA, A
    BRENNAN, J
    BELL, PRF
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1989, 40 (03) : 325 - 325
  • [2] Bosiers M, 2012, J CARDIOVASC SURG, V53, P223
  • [3] Boufi M, 2010, J VASC SURG, V52, P1211, DOI 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.05.107
  • [4] Balloon Angioplasty Versus Stenting With Nitinol Stents in Intermediate Length Superficial Femoral Artery Lesions
    Dick, Petra
    Wallner, Hubert
    Sabeti, Schila
    Loewe, Christian
    Mlekusch, Wolfgang
    Lammer, Johannes
    Koppensteiner, Renate
    Minar, Erich
    Schillinger, Martin
    [J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2009, 74 (07) : 1090 - 1095
  • [5] Funatsu Atsushi, 2010, J Invasive Cardiol, V22, pE74
  • [6] National trends in lower extremity bypass surgery, endovascular interventions, and major amputations
    Goodney, Philip P.
    Beck, Adam W.
    Nagle, Jan
    Welch, H. Gilbert
    Zwolak, Robert M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2009, 50 (01) : 54 - 60
  • [7] Nitinol Stent Implantation Versus Balloon Angioplasty for Lesions in the Superficial Femoral Artery and Proximal Popliteal Artery Twelve-Month Results From the RESILIENT Randomized Trial
    Laird, John R.
    Katzen, Barry T.
    Scheinert, Dierk
    Lammer, Johannes
    Carpenter, Jeffrey
    Buchbinder, Maurice
    Dave, Rajesh
    Ansel, Gary
    Lansky, Alexandra
    Cristea, Ecaterina
    Collins, Tyrone J.
    Goldstein, Jeffrey
    Jaff, Michael R.
    [J]. CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2010, 3 (03) : 267 - 276
  • [8] SUBINTIMAL ANGIOPLASTY OF FEMOROPOPLITEAL ARTERY OCCLUSIONS - THE LONG-TERM RESULTS
    LONDON, NJM
    SRINIVASAN, R
    NAYLOR, AR
    HARTSHORNE, T
    RATLIFF, DA
    BELL, PRF
    BOLIA, A
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1994, 8 (02): : 148 - 155
  • [9] PERCUTANEOUS INTENTIONAL EXTRALUMINAL RECANALIZATION OF THE FEMOROPOPLITEAL ARTERY
    REEKERS, JA
    KROMHOUT, JG
    JACOBS, MJHM
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1994, 8 (06): : 723 - 728
  • [10] Calloon angioplasty versus implantation of nitinol stents in the superficial femoral artery
    Schillinger, M
    Sabeti, S
    Loewe, C
    Dick, P
    Amighi, J
    Mlekusch, W
    Schlager, O
    Cejna, M
    Lammer, J
    Minar, E
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 354 (18) : 1879 - 1888