Transparency: The Revolution in Qualitative Research

被引：108

作者：

Moravcsik, Andrew ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Princeton Univ, Woodrow Wilson Sch, European Union Program, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA

来源：

PS-POLITICAL SCIENCE & POLITICS | 2014年 / 47卷 / 01期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1017/S1049096513001789

中图分类号：

D0 [政治学、政治理论];

学科分类号：

0302 ; 030201 ;

摘要：

Qualitative political science, the use of textual evidence to reconstruct causal mechanisms across a limited number of cases, is currently undergoing a methodological revolution. Many qualitative scholars-whether they use traditional case-study analysis, analytic narrative, structured focused comparison, counterfactual analysis, process tracing, ethnographic and participant-observation, or other methods-now believe that the richness, rigor, and transparency of qualitative research ought to be fundamentally improved.

引用

页码：48 / 53

页数：6

共 29 条

[1] American Political Science Association (APSA), 2013, GUID DAT ACC RES TRA
[2] [Anonymous], 2012, A guide to professional ethics in political science
[3] Beach Derek., 2013, PROCESS TRACING METH, DOI [10.3998/mpub.2556282, DOI 10.3998/MPUB.2556282]
[4] Case study methods in the international relations subfield
Bennett, Andrew
Elman, Colin
[J]. COMPARATIVE POLITICAL STUDIES, 2007, 40 (02) : 170 - 195
[5] Qualitative research: Recent developments in case study methods
Bennett, Andrew
Elman, Colin
[J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2006, 9 : 455 - 476
[6] Brady Henry., 2004, RETHINKING SOCIAL IN
[7] Christensen TJ, 2011, PRINC STUD INT HIST, P1
[8] Elman Colin., 2001, BRIDGES BOUNDARIES H
[9] Gaddis J.L., 2002, The landscape of history: How historians map the past
[10] Geertz C., 1973, The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays, P3, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315613192

← 1 2 3 →