Mapping cultural ecosystem services with rainforest aboriginal peoples: Integrating biocultural diversity, governance and social variation

被引:62
作者
Pert, Petina L. [1 ,2 ]
Hill, Rosemary [1 ,2 ]
Maclean, Kirsten [3 ]
Dale, Allan [8 ]
Rist, Phil [4 ]
Schmider, Joann [6 ]
Talbot, Leah [1 ,7 ]
Tawake, Lavenie [5 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO Ecosyst Sci, Cairns, Qld 4870, Australia
[2] James Cook Univ, Sch Earth & Environm Sci, Ctr Trop Environm & Sustainabil Sci, Cairns, Qld 4870, Australia
[3] CSIRO Ecosci Precinct, CORD Ecosyst Sci, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia
[4] Girringun Aboriginal Corp, Cardwell, Qld 4849, Australia
[5] Univ Sunshine Coast, Fac Arts & Business, Sustainabil Res Ctr, Maroochydore, DC 4558, Australia
[6] Cent Wet Trop Inst Country & Culture Aboriginal C, Manunda, Qld 4870, Australia
[7] Mamu Tradit Owner, Manuncta, Qld 4870, Australia
[8] James Cook Univ, Cairns Inst, Mirriwinni, Qld 4871, Australia
关键词
Cultural ecosystem services; Indigenous; Health rating; Indicator; BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION; MANAGEMENT; HOTSPOTS; VALUES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.10.012
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Cultural ecosystem services (CES) include the aesthetic, artistic, educational, spiritual and/or scientific values of ecosystems and have been described as 'intangible' and complex, reflecting diverse people-nature interactions that are embedded in dynamic linked social-ecological systems. CES have proved difficult to value, therefore mapping CES has largely concentrated on more tangible aspects, such as tourism and recreation presenting the risk that highly significant cultural relationships, such as those between Indigenous peoples and their traditional land, will be rendered invisible in ecosystem assessments. We present our results from co-research with a group of 'Rainforest Aboriginal peoples' from the Wet Tropics, Australia that illustrates a method to address this gap through mapping their perceptions of the health of Indigenous CES. We found that categories associated with biocultural diversity and governance matched their perceptions better than the usual framework that recognizes aesthetic, spiritual and other categories. Co-produced maps presented demonstrate spatial patterns of CES that are related primarily to variations in social attributes (such as adherence to cultural protocols), rather than the ecological attributes (such as biodiversity patterns). Further application of these concepts of biocultural diversity governance, and variation in social attributes when mapping CES, particularly in partnerships with Indigenous peoples is recommended. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 56
页数:16
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
AIATSIS, 2012, GUID ETH RES AUSTR I
[2]   Social-ecological hotspots mapping: A spatial approach for identifying coupled social-ecological space [J].
Alessa, Lilian ;
Kliskey, Andrew ;
Brown, Gregory .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2008, 85 (01) :27-39
[3]   Spatial covariance between biodiversity and other ecosystem service priorities [J].
Anderson, Barbara J. ;
Armsworth, Paul R. ;
Eigenbrod, Felix ;
Thomas, Chris D. ;
Gillings, Simon ;
Heinemeyer, Andreas ;
Roy, David B. ;
Gaston, Kevin J. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2009, 46 (04) :888-896
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2003, EC HUM WELL BEING FR
[5]  
[Anonymous], INDICATORS RELEVANT
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2002, CONV PROT WORLD CULT
[7]  
[Anonymous], SEV TROP CYCL YAS
[8]  
Australian Government, 2012, WORLD HER PLAC WET T
[9]   Targeting the management of ecosystem services based on social values: Where, what, and how? [J].
Bryan, Brett A. ;
Raymond, Christopher M. ;
Crossman, Neville D. ;
Macdonald, Darla Hatton .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2010, 97 (02) :111-122
[10]   Co-management: concepts and methodological implications [J].
Carlsson, L ;
Berkes, F .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2005, 75 (01) :65-76