Australian Mental Health Consumer and Carer Perspectives on Ethics in Adult Mental Health Research

被引:7
作者
Morse, Alyssa R. [1 ]
Forbes, Owen [2 ]
Jones, Bethany A. [1 ]
Gulliver, Amelia [1 ]
Banfield, Michelle [1 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Acton, ACT, Australia
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Ctr Mental Hlth Res, Acton, ACT, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
carer involvement; consumer involvement; mental health; research ethics; caregiver; service user; PROTECTION;
D O I
10.1177/1556264619844396
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Barriers to research arise when national ethical guidelines governing the inclusion of consumers in mental health research are implemented at the local level. Equivalent guidelines for research involving carers are not available. A social science investigation of Australian mental health consumer and carer perspectives on research ethics procedures was conducted in two interlinked stages: (a) a discussion forum with consumers, carers, and lived-experience researchers and (b) in-depth interviews with consumers and carers. Data collection and analysis drew strongly on methodological features of grounded theory. Privacy, confidentiality, and stigmatizing ethics procedures were key issues for consumer and carer participants. Recommendations for research practice include the following: considering the impact of information sharing on participants' relationships and adopting individual-focused approaches to managing research risks.
引用
收藏
页码:234 / 242
页数:9
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 310 (20): : 2191 - 2194
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2014, TRIC POL STAT ETH CO
  • [3] Cohort Profile: The PATH through life project
    Anstey, Kaarin J.
    Christensen, Helen
    Butterworth, Peter
    Easteal, Simon
    Mackinnon, Andrew
    Jacomb, Trish
    Maxwell, Karen
    Rodgers, Bryan
    Windsor, Tim
    Cherbuin, Nicolas
    Jorm, Anthony F.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 41 (04) : 951 - 960
  • [4] 'But is it a question worth asking?' A reflective case study describing how public involvement can lead to researchers' ideas being abandoned
    Boote, Jonathan D.
    Dalgleish, Mary
    Freeman, Janet
    Jones, Zena
    Miles, Marianne
    Rodgers, Helen
    [J]. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2014, 17 (03) : 440 - 451
  • [5] Charmaz K., 2006, CONSTRUCTING GROUNDE
  • [6] Ethical standards for mental health and psychosocial support research in emergencies: review of literature and current debates
    Chiumento, Anna
    Rahman, Atif
    Frith, Lucy
    Snider, Leslie
    Tol, Wietse A.
    [J]. GLOBALIZATION AND HEALTH, 2017, 13
  • [7] Dubois James, 2011, AJOB Prim Res, V2, P5
  • [8] Restoring Balance: A Consensus Statement on the Protection of Vulnerable Research Participants
    DuBois, James M.
    Beskow, Laura
    Campbell, Jean
    Dugosh, Karen
    Festinger, David
    Hartz, Sarah
    James, Rosalina
    Lidz, Charles
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2012, 102 (12) : 2220 - 2225
  • [9] 'What difference does it make?' Finding evidence of the impact of mental health service user researchers on research into the experiences of detained psychiatric patients
    Gillard, Steven
    Borschmann, Rohan
    Turner, Kati
    Goodrich-Purnell, Norman
    Lovell, Kathleen
    Chambers, Mary
    [J]. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2010, 13 (02) : 185 - 194
  • [10] Academic consumer researchers: a bridge between consumers and researchers
    Griffiths, KM
    Jorm, AF
    Christensen, H
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 38 (04) : 191 - 196