Robotic distal pancreatectomy versus conventional laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a comparative study for short-term outcomes

被引:44
作者
Lai, Eric C. H. [1 ]
Tang, Chung Ngai [1 ]
机构
[1] Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hosp, Dept Surg, Chaiwan, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
distal pancreatectomy; pancreatic neoplasm; robotic surgery; INTERNATIONAL STUDY-GROUP; RESECTIONS; EXPERIENCE; FISTULA;
D O I
10.1007/s11684-015-0404-0
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Robotic system has been increasingly used in pancreatectomy. However, the effectiveness of this method remains uncertain. This study compared the surgical outcomes between robot-assisted laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and conventional laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. During a 15-year period, 35 patients underwent minimally invasive approach of distal pancreatectomy in our center. Seventeen of these patients had robot-assisted laparoscopic approach, and the remaining 18 had conventional laparoscopic approach. Their operative parameters and perioperative outcomes were analyzed retrospectively in a prospective database. The mean operating time in the robotic group (221.4 min) was significantly longer than that in the laparoscopic group (173.6 min) (P = 0.026). Both robotic and conventional laparoscopic groups presented no significant difference in spleen-preservation rate (52.9% vs. 38.9%) (P = 0.505), operative blood loss (100.3 ml vs. 268.3 ml) (P = 0.29), overall morbidity rate (47.1% vs. 38.9%) (P = 0.73), and post-operative hospital stay (11.4 days vs. 14.2 days) (P = 0.46). Both groups also showed no perioperative mortality. Similar outcomes were observed in robotic distal pancreatectomy and conventional laparoscopic approach. However, robotic approach tended to have the advantages of less blood loss and shorter hospital stay. Further studies are necessary to determine the clinical position of robotic distal pancreatectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:356 / 360
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Postoperative pancreatic fistula: An international study group (ISGPF) definition
    Bassi, C
    Dervenis, C
    Butturini, G
    Fingerhut, A
    Yeo, C
    Izbicki, J
    Neoptolemos, J
    Sarr, M
    Traverso, W
    Buchler, M
    [J]. SURGERY, 2005, 138 (01) : 8 - 13
  • [2] Cuschieri A, 1994, J R Coll Surg Edinb, V39, P178
  • [3] Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Distal Pancreatectomy Is Superior to the Laparoscopic Technique
    Daouadi, Mustapha
    Zureikat, Amer H.
    Zenati, Mazen S.
    Choudry, Haroon
    Tsung, Alan
    Bartlett, David L.
    Hughes, Steven J.
    Lee, Ken K.
    Moser, A. James
    Zeh, Herbert J.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2013, 257 (01) : 128 - 132
  • [4] Early experience with laparoscopic resections of islet cell tumors
    Gagner, M
    Pomp, A
    Herrera, MF
    [J]. SURGERY, 1996, 120 (06) : 1051 - 1054
  • [5] Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: single-surgeon experience
    Giulianotti, Pier Cristoforo
    Sbrana, Fabio
    Bianco, Francesco Maria
    Elli, Enrique Fernando
    Shah, Galaxy
    Addeo, Pietro
    Caravaglios, Giuseppe
    Coratti, Andrea
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2010, 24 (07): : 1646 - 1657
  • [6] Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review of comparative studies
    Jusoh, Asri C.
    Ammori, Basil J.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 26 (04): : 904 - 913
  • [7] Conventional laparoscopic and robot-assisted spleen-preserving pancreatectomy: does da Vinci have clinical advantages?
    Kang, Chang Moo
    Kim, Dong Hyun
    Lee, Woo Jung
    Chi, Hoon Sang
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2011, 25 (06): : 2004 - 2009
  • [8] Current status of robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy: A comprehensive review
    Lai, Eric C. H.
    Chung Ngai Tang
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 2013, 6 (03) : 158 - 164
  • [9] Distal Pancreatectomy: A Single Institution's Experience in Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Approaches
    Lee, Ser Yee
    Allen, Peter J.
    Sadot, Eran
    D'Angelica, Michael I.
    DeMatteo, Ronald P.
    Fong, Yuman
    Jarnagin, William R.
    Kingham, T. Peter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2015, 220 (01) : 18 - 27
  • [10] Clinical and economic validation of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) classification scheme
    Pratt, Wande B.
    Maithel, Shishir K.
    Vanounou, Tsafrir
    Huang, Zhen S.
    Callery, Mark P.
    Vollmer, Charles M., Jr.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2007, 245 (03) : 443 - 451