Large-scale managed retreat and structural protection following the 2011 Japan tsunami

被引:19
作者
Pinter, Nicholas [1 ]
Ishiwateri, Mikio [2 ,3 ]
Nonoguchi, Atsuko [3 ,4 ]
Tanaka, Yumiko [3 ,5 ]
Casagrande, David [6 ]
Durden, Susan [7 ]
Rees, James [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Earth & Planetary Sci, Ctr Watershed Sci, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Univ Tokyo, Grad Sch Frontier Sci, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Japan Womens Network Disaster Risk Reduct, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Kokusaikogyo Co Ltd, Tokyo, Japan
[5] Josai Int Univ, Togane, Chiba 2838555, Japan
[6] Lehigh Univ, Dept Anthropol & Sociol, Bethlehem, PA 18015 USA
[7] US Army, Corps Engineers, Inst Water Resources, Alexandria, VA USA
关键词
Tsunami; Flooding; Disaster recovery; Disaster preparation; Risk management; Managed retreat;
D O I
10.1007/s11069-019-03602-7
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
On March 11, 2011, a magnitude M-W 9.0 thrust earthquake ruptured the Japan Trench along the northwest coast of Honshu and generated a tsunami that killed 15,894 people, left 2585 missing (as of March 2017) and destroyed more than 130,000 houses. The purpose of this paper is to review the current status and scope of tsunami recovery in the Tohoku region, focusing on investments in structural protection measures as well as extensive implementation of non-structural managed retreat. Japan's response to the 2011 tsunami contrasts with approaches to disaster management in the USA and elsewhere in the world. New structural protections built in Japan since 2011 include a massive concrete-lined tsunami barrier system, stretching>400km of coast, at a cost of at least $8 billion. Managed retreat is a relatively new area of research and risk management focusing on withdrawal of infrastructure and population from at-risk areas. Japan's post-tsunami disaster response may represent the single largest case of disaster-related managed retreat in recent world history. Approximately 145,000 homes, including whole new towns, are being built outside the tsunami hazard zone. Disaster managers worldwide should look to Japan for lessons learned from the investment and efforts since 2011.
引用
收藏
页码:1429 / 1436
页数:8
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, HIGH RISK SER UPD
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, STEMM TID FLOOD LOSS
[3]   Enabling Participatory Planning After Disasters: A Case Study of the World Bank's Housing Reconstruction in Turkey [J].
Ganapati, N. Emel ;
Ganapati, Sukumar .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION, 2009, 75 (01) :41-59
[4]  
Hauer ME, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P691, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2961, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2961]
[5]  
Hofstede Geert., 1983, INT STUDIES MANAGEME, V13, P46, DOI [DOI 10.1080/00208825.1983.11656358, 10.1080/00208825.1983.11656358]
[6]  
Japan Reconstruction Agency, 2017, ROAD REC REV REC GRE
[7]  
NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) U. S, 2018, BILL DOLL WEATH CLIM
[8]   Environment - One step forward, two steps back on US floodplains [J].
Pinter, N .
SCIENCE, 2005, 308 (5719) :207-208
[9]  
Ranghieri F, 2014, LEARNING FROM MEGADISASTERS
[10]  
LESSONS FROM THE GREAT EAST JAPAN EARTHQUAKE, P1, DOI 10.1596/978-1-4648-0153-2