Hybrid volumetric-modulated arc therapy for postoperative breast cancer including regional lymph nodes: the advantage of dosimetric data and safety of toxicities

被引:12
|
作者
Doi, Yoshiko [1 ,2 ]
Nakao, Minoru [1 ]
Miura, Hideharu [1 ]
Ozawa, Shuichi [1 ]
Kenjo, Masahiro [1 ]
Nagata, Yasushi [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hiroshima High Precis Radiotherapy Canc Ctr, Higashi Ku, 3-2-2 Futabanosato, Hiroshima, Hiroshima 7320057, Japan
[2] Hiroshima Univ, Inst Biomed & Hlth Sci, Dept Radiat Oncol, Higashi Ku, 3-2-2 Futabanosato, Hiroshima, Hiroshima 7320057, Japan
关键词
postoperative breast cancer; regional lymph nodes; hybrid volumetric-modulated arc therapy; homogeneity and conformity; lung irradiation dose; RADIATION-THERAPY; WHOLE-BREAST; RADIOTHERAPY; IMRT; RISK; IRRADIATION; MOTION; 3D-CRT;
D O I
10.1093/jrr/rraa057
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
To improve the homogeneity and conformity of the irradiation dose for postoperative breast cancer including regional lymph nodes, we planned Hybrid volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), which combines conventional tangential field mainly for the chest area and VMAT mainly for the supraclavicular area and marginal zone. In this study, we compared the dosimetric impact between traditional 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and Hybrid VMAT and observed toxicities following Hybrid VMAT. A total of 70 patients indicated between October 2016 and December 2017 were included. The prescribed dose was 50 Gy/25 fractions. For the dosimetric impact, 3DCRT and Hybrid VMAT plans were compared in each patient with respect to the dosimetric parameters. Toxicities were followed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. The median follow-up duration was 319 days. For the do simetric impact, the h omogeneity index (HI) and conformity index (CI) of PTV were significantly improved in the Hybrid VMAT plan compared with that in the 3DCRT plan (HI, 0.15 +/- 0.07 in Hybrid VMAT vs 0.41 +/- 0.19 in 3DCRT, P < 0.001; CI, 1.61 +/- 0.44 in Hybrid VMAT vs 2.10 +/- 0.56 in 3DCRT, P < 0.001). The mean irradiated ipsilateral lung dose was not significantly different in both plans (12.0 +/- 2.4 Gy in Hybrid VMAT vs 11.8 +/- 2.8 Gy in 3DCRT, P < 0.533). Regarding toxicity, there were no patients who developed >= grade 3 acute toxicity and >= grade 2 pneumonitis during the follow-up. Hybrid VMAT for postoperative breast cancer including regional lymph nodes was a reasonable technique that improved the homogeneity and conformity of the irradiation dose to the planning target volume while keeping the irradiation dose to organs at risk to a minimum.
引用
收藏
页码:747 / 754
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dosimetric comparison of hybrid volumetric-modulated arc therapy, volumetric-modulated arc therapy, and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for left-sided early breast cancer
    Lin, Jia-Fu
    Yeh, Dah-Cherng
    Yeh, Hui-Ling
    Chang, Chen-Fa
    Lin, Jin-Ching
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2015, 40 (03) : 262 - 267
  • [2] Hybrid volumetric modulated arc therapy for whole breast irradiation: a dosimetric comparison of different arc designs
    Ramasubramanian, Velayudham
    Balaji, Karunakaran
    Subramanian, Sitaraman Balaji
    Sathiya, Krishnamoorthi
    Thirunavukarasu, Moorthi
    Radha, Chandrasekaran Anu
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2019, 124 (06): : 546 - 554
  • [3] Dosimetric Effect on Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy: Single Institutional Experience
    Hashem, Rania
    Mulla, Zaheeda
    Ghassal, Nour
    Bokhary, Ayman
    Howladar, Fatimah
    Fallatah, Kholoud
    Iskandarani, Omar
    Attar, Mohammad
    Ujaimi, Reem
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2021, 10 (02): : 55 - 62
  • [4] Dosimetric benefits of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy in the treatment of postoperative cervical cancer patients
    Deng, Xia
    Han, Ce
    Chen, Shan
    Xie, Congying
    Yi, Jinling
    Zhou, Yongqiang
    Zheng, Xiaomin
    Deng, Zhenxiang
    Jin, Xiance
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 18 (01): : 25 - 31
  • [5] Dosimetric comparison of volumetric-modulated arc therapy and helical tomotherapy for adjuvant treatment of bilateral breast cancer
    Phurailatpam, Reena
    Wadasadawala, Tabassum
    Chauhan, Kamalnayan
    Panda, Subhajit
    Sarin, Rajiv
    JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2022, 21 (01) : 36 - 44
  • [6] Dosimetric advantage of volumetric modulated arc therapy in the treatment of intraocular cancer
    Deng, Zhenxiang
    Shen, Lanxiao
    Zheng, Xiaomin
    Zhou, Yongqiang
    Yi, Jinling
    Han, Ce
    Xie, Congying
    Jin, Xiance
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2017, 12
  • [7] Dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy, volumetric-modulated arc therapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, and field-in-field technique for synchronous bilateral breast cancer
    Cheng, Hao-Wen
    Chang, Chih-Chieh
    Shiau, An-Cheng
    Wang, Ming-Hua
    Tsai, Jo-Ting
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2020, 45 (03) : 271 - 277
  • [8] Dosimetric comparison between interstitial brachytherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy for tumor bed boost in breast cancer
    Periasamy, Kannan
    Karunanithi, Gunaseelan
    Cholayil, Shamsudheen
    Dharanipragada, Kadambari
    Neelakanadan, Vijayprabhu
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2021, 13 (03) : 302 - 309
  • [9] Dosimetric impact of dental metallic crown on intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy for head and neck cancer
    Kamomae, Takeshi
    Itoh, Yoshiyuki
    Okudaira, Kuniyasu
    Nakaya, Takayoshi
    Tomida, Masashi
    Miyake, Yoshikazu
    Oguchi, Hiroshi
    Shiinoki, Takehiro
    Kawamura, Mariko
    Yamamoto, Noriyuki
    Naganawa, Shinji
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 17 (01): : 234 - 245
  • [10] Dosimetric and delivery characterizations of full-arc and half-arc volumetric-modulated arc therapy for maxillary cancer
    Miura, Hideharu
    Fujiwara, Masayuki
    Tanooka, Masao
    Doi, Hiroshi
    Inoue, Hiroyuki
    Takada, Yasuhiro
    Kamikonya, Norihiko
    Hirota, Shozo
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2012, 53 (05) : 785 - 790