Are systematic reviews more cost-effective than randomised trials?

被引：19
作者：
Glasziou, P [1 ]
Djulbegovic, B
Burls, A
机构：
[1] Univ Oxford, Ctr Evidence Based Med, Dept Primary Hlth Care, Oxford OX3 7LF, England
[2] Univ S Florida, H Lee Moffier Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
[3] Univ Birmingham, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
来源：
LANCET | 2006年 / 367卷 / 9528期
关键词：
D O I：
10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68919-8
中图分类号：
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号：
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：2057 / 2058
页数：2
相关论文
共 3 条
  • [1] A COMPARISON OF RESULTS OF METAANALYSES OF RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIALS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF CLINICAL EXPERTS - TREATMENTS FOR MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION
    ANTMAN, EM
    LAU, J
    KUPELNICK, B
    MOSTELLER, F
    CHALMERS, TC
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1992, 268 (02): : 240 - 248
  • [2] Effect of a US National Institutes of Health programme of clinical trials on public health and costs
    Johnston, SC
    Rootenberg, JD
    Katrak, S
    Smith, WS
    Elkins, JS
    [J]. LANCET, 2006, 367 (9519) : 1319 - 1327
  • [3] COLLABORATIVE WORLDWIDE OVERVIEWS OF RANDOMIZED TRIALS
    SANDERCOCK, P
    [J]. DOING MORE GOOD THAN HARM: THE EVALUATION OF HEALTH CARE INTERVENTIONS, 1993, 703 : 149 - 155
1