Individual Differences in Susceptibility to Misinformation Effects and Hindsight Bias

被引:12
作者
Calvillo, Dustin P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Calif State Univ San Marcos, San Marcos, CA 92096 USA
关键词
working memory capacity; individual differences; hindsight bias; misinformation effects; WORKING-MEMORY CAPACITY; MISLEADING POSTEVENT INFORMATION; PREDICTS FALSE MEMORIES; EMBEDDED-FIGURES TEST; EYEWITNESS MEMORY; FIELD-DEPENDENCE; DISTORTION; IMAGERY; SUGGESTIBILITY; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1080/00221309.2014.954917
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
ABSTRACT. The present study examined individual differences in susceptibility to two similar forms of memory distortion: the misinformation effect and hindsight bias. The misinformation effect occurs when individuals witness an event, are provided with misinformation, and recall the original event as containing elements of the misinformation. Hindsight bias occurs when individuals make judgments, are provided with feedback, and recall their original judgments as being more similar to the feedback than they actually were. Seventy-five participants completed a misinformation task, a hindsight bias task, and several individual difference measures related to memory distortions. Working memory capacity was negatively correlated with the misinformation effect and hindsight bias, and the misinformation effect and hindsight bias were negatively correlated with one another. Although the misinformation effect and hindsight bias are measured with similar designs, and both are predicted by working memory capacity, the negative correlation between them suggests these phenomena result from somewhat different processes.
引用
收藏
页码:393 / 407
页数:15
相关论文
共 59 条
[11]   A POWER PRIMER [J].
COHEN, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1992, 112 (01) :155-159
[12]   False memories and individual variations: The role of Field Dependence-Independence [J].
Corson, Yves ;
Verrier, Nadege ;
Bucic, Andreana .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2009, 47 (01) :8-11
[13]   Not necessarily better, but certainly different: A limit to the advertising misinformation effect on memory [J].
Cowley, E ;
Janus, E .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2004, 31 (01) :229-235
[14]   FIELD-DEPENDENCE AND HINDSIGHT BIAS - COGNITIVE RESTRUCTURING AND THE GENERATION OF REASONS [J].
DAVIES, MF .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 1992, 26 (01) :58-74
[15]   IMAGERY ABILITY AND SOURCE MONITORING - IMPLICATIONS FOR EYEWITNESS MEMORY [J].
DOBSON, M ;
MARKHAM, R .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 84 :111-118
[16]   Using an Individual Differences Approach to Examine Two Distinct Types of Suggestibility Effects [J].
Eisen, Mitchell L. ;
Gomes, Dayna M. ;
Lorber, William G. ;
Perez, Cynthia I. ;
Uchishiba, Hitomi .
APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 27 (01) :2-11
[17]   I KNEW IT WOULD HAPPEN - REMEMBERED PROBABILITIES OF ONCE-FUTURE THINGS [J].
FISCHHOFF, B ;
BEYTH, R .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 1975, 13 (01) :1-16
[18]   Personality characteristics associated with susceptibility to false memories [J].
Frost, Peter ;
Sparrow, Sarah ;
Barry, Jennifer .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 119 (02) :193-204
[19]   Individual differences in working memory capacity affect false memories for missing aspects of events [J].
Gerrie, Matthew P. ;
Garry, Maryanne .
MEMORY, 2007, 15 (05) :561-571
[20]   A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains [J].
Gosling, SD ;
Rentfrow, PJ ;
Swann, WB .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 2003, 37 (06) :504-528