Ecological footprint of the Chinese population, environment and development

被引:7
作者
Chen, DJ [1 ]
Cheng, GD [1 ]
Xu, ZM [1 ]
Zhang, ZQ [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, State Key Lab Frozen Soil Engn, Cold & Arid Reg Environm & Engn Res Inst, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China
关键词
biocapacity; ecological footprint; expenditure elasticity; income elasticity; production coefficient; gross domestic product; sustainable development; China;
D O I
10.1017/S037689290400102X
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The ecological footprint (EF) can be used to investigate relationships between population, environment and development. In China, the per Caput EF is estimated to have increased by 83% between 1981 (0.82 ha caput(-1)) and 2000 (1.49 ha caput(-1)), to about 1.31 times China's area (including its oceanic territory), while the ecological deficit increased from 0.066 ha caput(-1) in 1981 to 0.735 ha caput(-1) in 2000. Over this period, the proportions of six sub-footprint types have changed considerably: the percentages of arable, fossil energy and forest land decreased from 44.8%, 41.5% and 4.1% to 27.1%, 40.1% and 3.0%, respectively; while sea, pasture and built-up land percentages increased from 3.8%, 4.4% and 1.3% to 15.2%, 12.4% and 2.2%, respectively. The production coefficients of gross domestic product (GDP) to the EF of China increased from 584 RMB ha(-1) in 1981, to 1522 RMB ha(-1) in 2000, reflecting an increasing efficiency in resource use. The EF correlates positively with disposable income and expenditure, which can be described by income and expenditure elasticity. Some measures are suggested to decrease the Chinese ecological deficit on the road to sustainability.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 68
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Simple Analysis Based on the Ecological Footprint of Linyi City for Sustainable Development [J].
Liang Renjun ;
Qi Xiangzhen .
PROCEEDINGS OF SYMPOSIUM FROM CROSS-STRAIT ENVIRONMENT & RESOURCES AND 2ND REPRESENTATIVE CONFERENCE OF CHINESE ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES & ECOLOGICAL CONSERVATION SOCIETY, 2010, :171-175
[32]   Development of an ecological security evaluation method based on the ecological footprint and application to a typical steppe region in China [J].
Li, Xiaobing ;
Tian, Meirong ;
Wang, Hong ;
Wang, Han ;
Yu, Jingjing .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2014, 39 :153-159
[33]   Temporal and spatial assessment of natural resource use in China using ecological footprint method [J].
Chen, Min ;
Wang, Rusong ;
Zhang, Lijun ;
Xu, Chonggang .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND WORLD ECOLOGY, 2006, 13 (04) :255-268
[35]   INDICATORS OF SUSTAINABILITY - ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT ANALYSIS OF THE ARAD COUNTY [J].
Tigan, E. ;
Brinzan, O. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND ECOLOGY, 2012, 13 (2A) :1019-1024
[36]   Ecological Footprint: Implications for biodiversity [J].
Galli, Alessandro ;
Wackernagel, Mathis ;
Iha, Katsunori ;
Lazarus, Elias .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2014, 173 :121-132
[37]   Ecological footprint of Shandong,China [J].
Luc Hens .
Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2004, (01) :167-172
[38]   Ecological footprint accounting of "TAKUMI" [J].
Otsuka, Koji .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE SEVENTH (2007) ISOPE OCEAN MINING (& GAS HYDRATES) SYMPOSIUM, 2007, :33-38
[39]   Ecological footprint of Shandong, China [J].
Cui, YJ ;
Hens, L ;
Zhu, YG ;
Zhao, JZ .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2004, 16 (01) :167-172
[40]   Urban Optimum Population Size and Development Pattern Based on Ecological Footprint Model: Case of Zhoushan, China [J].
Lu Yuan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUILT ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 3 (03) :134-141