Remote sensing of aerosols in the Arctic for an evaluation of global climate model simulations

被引:27
作者
Glantz, Paul [1 ]
Bourassa, Adam [2 ]
Herber, Andreas [3 ]
Iversen, Trond [4 ,5 ]
Karlsson, Johannes [6 ]
Kirkevag, Alf [5 ]
Maturilli, Marion [3 ]
Seland, Oyvind [5 ]
Stebel, Kerstin [7 ]
Struthers, Hamish [8 ]
Tesche, Matthias [1 ]
Thomason, Larry [9 ]
机构
[1] Stockholm Univ, Dept Appl Environm Sci, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Univ Saskatchewan, Inst Space & Atmospher Studies, Saskatoon, SK S7N 0W0, Canada
[3] Alfred Wegener Inst Polar & Marine Res, Bremerhaven, Germany
[4] ECMWF, Reading, Berks, England
[5] Norwegian Meteorol Inst, Oslo, Norway
[6] Stockholm Univ, Dept Meteorol, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
[7] Norwegian Inst Air Res, Oslo, Norway
[8] Linkoping Univ, Natl Supercomp Ctr, Linkoping, Sweden
[9] NASA, Langley Res Ctr, Hampton, VA 23665 USA
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
OPTICAL DEPTH RETRIEVAL; SEA-SALT AEROSOLS; CHEMICAL-COMPOSITION; AIR-POLLUTION; NY-ALESUND; STRATOSPHERIC AEROSOL; LIGHT-SCATTERING; WIND-SPEED; MODIS; CLOUD;
D O I
10.1002/2013JD021279
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
In this study Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Aqua retrievals of aerosol optical thickness (AOT) at 555 nm are compared to Sun photometer measurements from Svalbard for a period of 9 years. For the 642 daily coincident measurements that were obtained, MODIS AOT generally varies within the predicted uncertainty of the retrieval over ocean (Delta AOT = +/- 0.03 +/- 0.05 . AOT). The results from the remote sensing have been used to examine the accuracy in estimates of aerosol optical properties in the Arctic, generated by global climate models and from in situ measurements at the Zeppelin station, Svalbard. AOT simulated with the Norwegian Earth System Model/Community Atmosphere Model version 4 Oslo global climate model does not reproduce the observed seasonal variability of the Arctic aerosol. The model overestimates clear-sky AOT by nearly a factor of 2 for the background summer season, while tending to underestimate the values in the spring season. Furthermore, large differences in all-sky AOT of up to 1 order of magnitude are found for the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 5 model ensemble for the spring and summer seasons. Large differences between satellite/ground-based remote sensing of AOT and AOT estimated from dry and humidified scattering coefficients are found for the subarctic marine boundary layer in summer.
引用
收藏
页码:8169 / 8188
页数:20
相关论文
共 99 条
  • [31] AERONET - A federated instrument network and data archive for aerosol characterization
    Holben, BN
    Eck, TF
    Slutsker, I
    Tanre, D
    Buis, JP
    Setzer, A
    Vermote, E
    Reagan, JA
    Kaufman, YJ
    Nakajima, T
    Lavenu, F
    Jankowiak, I
    Smirnov, A
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1998, 66 (01) : 1 - 16
  • [32] The dynamical simulation of the Community Atmosphere Model version 3 (CAM3)
    Hurrell, James W.
    Hack, James J.
    Phillips, Adam S.
    Caron, Julie
    Yin, Jeffrey
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2006, 19 (11) : 2162 - 2183
  • [33] Remote sensing of aerosols over snow using infrared AATSR observations
    Istomina, L. G.
    von Hoyningen-Huene, W.
    Kokhanovsky, A. A.
    Schultz, E.
    Burrows, J. P.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2011, 4 (06) : 1133 - 1145
  • [34] The Norwegian Earth System Model, NorESM1-M - Part 2: Climate response and scenario projections
    Iversen, T.
    Bentsen, M.
    Bethke, I.
    Debernard, J. B.
    Kirkevag, A.
    Seland, O.
    Drange, H.
    Kristjansson, J. E.
    Medhaug, I.
    Sand, M.
    Seierstad, I. A.
    [J]. GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2013, 6 (02) : 389 - 415
  • [35] Arctic air pollution and large scale atmospheric flows
    Iversen, T.
    Joranger, E.
    [J]. Atmospheric Environment - Part A General Topics, 1985, 19 (12): : 2099 - 2108
  • [36] SOME STATISTICAL PROPERTIES OF GROUND-LEVEL AIR-POLLUTION AT NORWEGIAN ARCTIC STATIONS AND THEIR RELATION TO LARGE-SCALE ATMOSPHERIC FLOW SYSTEMS
    IVERSEN, T
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1989, 23 (11) : 2451 - 2462
  • [37] Observations of the evolution of the aerosol, cloud and boundary-layer characteristics during the 1st ACE-2 Lagrangian experiment
    Johnson, DW
    Osborne, S
    Wood, R
    Suhre, K
    Quinn, PK
    Bates, T
    Andreae, MO
    Noone, KJ
    Glantz, P
    Bandy, B
    Rudolph, J
    O'Dowd, C
    [J]. TELLUS SERIES B-CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL METEOROLOGY, 2000, 52 (02) : 348 - 374
  • [38] High-Resolution Global Climate Simulations with the ECMWF Model in Project Athena: Experimental Design, Model Climate, and Seasonal Forecast Skill
    Jung, T.
    Miller, M. J.
    Palmer, T. N.
    Towers, P.
    Wedi, N.
    Achuthavarier, D.
    Adams, J. M.
    Altshuler, E. L.
    Cash, B. A.
    Kinter, J. L., III
    Marx, L.
    Stan, C.
    Hodges, K. I.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2012, 25 (09) : 3155 - 3172
  • [39] Response to "Toward unified satellite climatology of aerosol properties. 3. MODIS versus MISR versus AERONET"
    Kahn, Ralph A.
    Garay, Michael J.
    Nelson, David L.
    Levy, Robert C.
    Bull, Michael A.
    Diner, David J.
    Martonchik, John V.
    Hansen, Earl G.
    Remer, Lorraine A.
    Tanre, Didier
    [J]. JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE SPECTROSCOPY & RADIATIVE TRANSFER, 2011, 112 (05) : 901 - 909
  • [40] VALIDATION OF STRATOSPHERIC AEROSOL AND GAS EXPERIMENT-I AND EXPERIMENT-II SATELLITE AEROSOL OPTICAL DEPTH MEASUREMENTS USING SURFACE RADIOMETER DATA
    KENT, GS
    MCCORMICK, MP
    WANG, PH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1994, 99 (D5) : 10333 - 10339