Measuring quality of pharmacotherapy for depression in a national health care system

被引:40
|
作者
Busch, SH
Leslie, D
Rosenheck, R
机构
[1] Yale Sch Med, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, New Haven, CT USA
[2] VA New England Mental Illness Res, Educ & Clin Ctr, West Haven, CT USA
[3] VAMC, NE Program Evaluat Ctr, West Haven, CT USA
关键词
quality; treatment guidelines; major depression;
D O I
10.1097/01.mlr.0000128000.96869.1e
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: This article examines the use of antidepressant medication in the treatment of major depression in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) during the 2001 fiscal year and considers the relationship of patient, drug, provider, and facility to adherence to medication treatment guidelines. Methods: Prescription drug records for all VA outpatients diagnosed with major depression (International Classification of Diseases, 9th edition, code 296.2 or 296.3) were collected for October 2000 through September 2001. Indicators were constructed that noted whether patients newly treated with antidepressants (ie, with no prescription in the previous 8 weeks) received at least 180 days (continuation phase) of antidepressant drug treatment (84- and 140-day measures were also considered). Logistic regression with and without center fixed effects and generalized estimation equations were used to identify patient, drug, and facility characteristics that were associated with these treatment quality indicators. Results: Of the 27,713 patients in the final sample, 54% received at least 181 days of treatment. This is higher than recent rates reported by Health Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS) for the general population, although our measures and those used by HEDIS are not exactly the same. Women, married patients, older patients, and whites were more likely than others to have higher-quality antidepressant drug treatment. Contrary to previous research, we find few significant differences among specific antidepressant agents prescribed in this large sample. Comorbid substance abuse was associated with fewer days of treatment, whereas other psychiatric comorbidities increased the length of treatment. We found few differences resulting from provider type. Although significant differences among facilities were found in the unadjusted rates (similar to those used by HEDIS), these diminished greatly after controlling for relevant covariates. Conclusions: In the nation's largest mental health system, quality of pharmacotherapy for depression, at least by one standard measure, is relatively good. We found the specific antidepressant drug used has little impact on quality. In considering differences among facilities, we found that it is critical to control for relevant patient characteristics.
引用
收藏
页码:532 / 542
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Quality of critical care clinical practice guidelines involving pharmacotherapy recommendations
    Edwards, Christopher
    Lam, Jonathan
    Gardiner, Jordan
    Erstad, Brian L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2022, 79 (21) : 1919 - 1924
  • [42] A pole quality system dashboard for health care institutions, an educational tool
    Moll, Marie Christine
    Decavel, Frederique
    Merlet, Christine
    RECHERCHE EN SOINS INFIRMIERS, 2009, (98): : 19 - 27
  • [43] Development and implementation of a nationwide health care quality indicator system in Taiwan
    Chiu, Wen-Ta
    Yang, Che-Ming
    Lin, Hui-Wen
    Chu, Tu-Bin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2007, 19 (01) : 21 - 28
  • [44] Benefits of collaborative care for post-CABG depression are not related to adjustments in antidepressant pharmacotherapy
    Meyer, Thomas
    Belnap, Bea Herbeck
    Herrmann-Lingen, Christoph
    He, Fanyin
    Mazumdar, Sati
    Rollman, Bruce L.
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2014, 76 (01) : 28 - 33
  • [45] RECALAD. Patient care at National Health System Digestive Care Units - A pilot study, 2015
    Fernandez Rodriguez, Conrado M.
    Fernandez Perez, Cristina
    Luis Bernal, Jose
    Vera, Isabel
    Elola, Javier
    Judez, Javier
    Carballo, Fernando
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS, 2018, 110 (01) : 44 - 50
  • [46] Brief report: Quality of ambulatory care for women and men in the veterans affairs health care system
    Ashish K. Jha
    Jonathan B. Perlin
    Michael A. Steinman
    John W. Peabody
    John Z. Ayanian
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2005, 20 : 762 - 765
  • [47] Definition of quality in health care
    Kanecki, Krzysztof
    Tyszko, Piotr
    FAMILY MEDICINE AND PRIMARY CARE REVIEW, 2008, 10 (01) : 50 - 54
  • [48] Why measuring outcomes is important in health care
    Pantaleon, Lucas
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2019, 33 (02) : 356 - 362
  • [49] Measuring quality: from the system to the provider
    Evans, DB
    Edejer, TTT
    Lauer, J
    Frenk, J
    Murray, CJL
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2001, 13 (06) : 439 - 446
  • [50] A Learning Health System Framework to Operationalize Health Data to Improve Quality Care: An Australian Perspective
    Enticott, Joanne C.
    Melder, Angela
    Johnson, Alison
    Jones, Angela
    Shaw, Tim
    Keech, Wendy
    Buttery, Jim
    Teede, Helena
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2021, 8