Cervical Conization and Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in the Treatment of Stage I Cervical Cancer Is Less Enough?

被引:42
作者
Andikyan, Vaagn [1 ]
Khoury-Collado, Fady [1 ]
Denesopolis, John [1 ]
Park, Kay J. [2 ]
Hussein, Yaser R. [2 ]
Brown, Carol L. [1 ,3 ]
Sonoda, Yukio [1 ,3 ]
Chi, Dennis S. [1 ,3 ]
Barakat, Richard R. [1 ,3 ]
Abu-Rustum, Nadeem R. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Gynecol Serv, Dept Surg, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, New York, NY 10065 USA
[3] Weill Cornell Med Coll, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, New York, NY USA
关键词
Stage I cervical cancer; Conization; Sentinel lymph node mapping; RADICAL TRACHELECTOMY; HYSTERECTOMY; MANAGEMENT; OUTCOMES; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1097/IGC.0000000000000034
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives This study aimed to determine the feasibility of cervical conization and sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping as a fertility-sparing strategy to treat stage I cervical cancer and to estimate the tumor margin status needed to achieve no residual carcinoma in the cervix. Methods We identified all patients who desired fertility preservation and underwent SLN mapping with cervical conization for stage I cervical cancer from September 2005 to August 2012. Relevant demographic, clinical, and pathologic information was collected. Results Ten patients were identified. Median age was 28 years (range, 18-36 years). None of the patients had a grossly visible tumor. The initial diagnosis of invasive carcinoma was made either on a loop electrosurgical excision procedure or cone biopsy. All patients underwent preoperative radiologic evaluation (magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography-computed tomography). None of the patients had evidence of gross tumor or suspicion of lymph node metastasis on imaging. Stage distribution included 7 (70%) patients with stage IA1 cervical cancer with lymphovascular invasion and 3 (30%) patients with microscopic IB1. Histologic diagnosis included 8 (80%) patients with squamous cell carcinoma, 1 (10%) patient with adenocarcinoma, and 1 (10%) patient with clear cell carcinoma. Nine patients underwent repeat cervical conization with SLN mapping, and 1 patient underwent postconization cervical biopsies and SLN mapping. None of the patients had residual tumor identified on the final specimen. The median distance from the invasive carcinoma to the endocervical margin was 2.25 mm, and the distance from the invasive carcinoma to the ectocervical margin was 1.9 mm. All collected lymph nodes were negative for metastasis. After a median follow-up of 17 months (range, 1-83 months), none of the patients' conditions were diagnosed with recurrent disease and 3 (30%) patients achieved pregnancy. Conclusions Cervical conization and SLN mapping seems to be an acceptable treatment strategy for selected patients with small-volume stage I cervical cancer. Tumor clearance of 2 mm and above seems to correlate well with no residual on repeat conization. A larger sample size and longer follow-up is needed to establish the long-term outcomes of this procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 117
页数:5
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Surgical and pathologic outcomes of fertility-sparing radical abdominal trachelectomy for FIGO stage IB1 cervical cancer
    Abu-Rustum, Nadeem R.
    Neubauer, Nikki
    Sonoda, Yukio
    Park, Kay J.
    Gemignani, Mary
    Alektiar, Kaled M.
    Tew, William
    Leitao, Mario M.
    Chi, Dennis S.
    Barakat, Richard R.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2008, 111 (02) : 261 - 264
  • [2] Sentinel lymph node identification for early-stage cervical cancer
    Abu-Rustum, Nadeem R.
    Sonoda, Yukio
    Gemignani, Mary L.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2007, 104 (02) : S2 - S4
  • [3] Small volume stage 1B1 cervical cancer Is radical surgery still necessary?
    Biliatis, Ioannis
    Kucukmetin, Ali
    Patel, Amit
    Ratnavelu, Nithya
    Cross, Paul
    Chattopadhyay, Supratik
    Galaal, Khadra
    Naik, Raj
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2012, 126 (01) : 73 - 77
  • [4] Management of pregnancy after radical trachelectomy: case reports and systematic review of the literature
    Jolley, Jennifer A.
    Battista, Leah
    Wing, Deborah A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2007, 24 (09) : 531 - 539
  • [5] Reproductive outcomes of patients undergoing radical trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer
    Kim, C. H.
    Abu-Rustum, N. R.
    Chi, D. S.
    Gardner, G. J.
    Leitao, M. M., Jr.
    Carter, J.
    Barakat, R. R.
    Sonoda, Y.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2012, 125 (03) : 585 - 588
  • [6] Prevalence of lymph nodes in the parametrium of radical vaginal trachelectomy (RVT) specimen
    Lanowska, Malgorzata
    Morawietz, Lars
    Sikora, Arne
    Raeber, Gert
    Mangler, Mandy
    Speiser, Dorothee
    Hasenbein, Kati
    Chiantera, Vito
    Koehler, Christhardt
    Schneider, Achim
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2011, 121 (02) : 298 - 302
  • [7] Oncological safety of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal radical trachelectomy (LARVT or Dargent's operation): A comparative study with laparoscopic-assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy (LARVH)
    Marchiole, Pierangelo
    Benchaib, Mehdi
    Buenerd, Annie
    Lazlo, Emeric
    Dargent, Daniel
    Mathevet, Patrice
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2007, 106 (01) : 132 - 141
  • [8] Simple extrafascial trachelectomy and pelvic bilateral lymphadenectomy in early stage cervical cancer
    Palaia, Innocenza
    Musella, Angela
    Bellati, Filippo
    Marchetti, Claudia
    Di Donato, Violante
    Perniola, Giorgia
    Panici, Pierluigi Benedetti
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2012, 126 (01) : 78 - 81
  • [9] Conservative management of early stage cervical cancer: Is there a role for less radical surgery?
    Schmeler, Kathleen M.
    Frumovitz, Michael
    Ramirez, Pedro T.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2011, 120 (03) : 321 - 325
  • [10] A fertility-sparing alternative to radical hysterectomy: how many patients may be eligible?
    Sonoda, Y
    Abu-Rustum, NR
    Gemignani, ML
    Chi, DS
    Brown, CL
    Poynor, EA
    Barakat, RR
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2004, 95 (03) : 534 - 538