Feasibility of Perioperative eHealth Interventions for Older Surgical Patients: A Systematic Review

被引:17
作者
Jonker, Leonie T. [1 ,2 ]
Haveman, Marjolein E. [1 ]
de Bock, Geertruida H. [2 ]
van Leeuwen, Barbara L. [1 ]
Lahr, Maarten M. H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Surg, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Epidemiol, Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
Telemedicine; aged; postoperative care; surgery; eHealth; feasibility; SELF-MANAGEMENT; FOLLOW-UP; E-HEALTH; SURGERY; TELEMEDICINE; RECOVERY; CARE; TECHNOLOGY; PROGRAM; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jamda.2020.05.035
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Objectives: EHealth interventions are increasingly being applied in perioperative care but have not been adequately studied for older surgical patients who could potentially benefit from them. Therefore, we evaluated the feasibility of perioperative eHealth interventions for this population. Design: A systematic review of prospective observational and interventional studies was conducted. Three electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL) were searched between January 1999 and July 2019. Study quality was assessed by Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) with and without control group. Setting and Participants: Studies of surgical patients with an average age >= 65 years undergoing any perioperative eHealth intervention with active patient participation (with the exception of telerehabilitation following orthopedic surgery) were included. Measures: The main outcome measure was feasibility, defined as a patient's perceptions of usability, satisfaction, and/or acceptability of the intervention. Other outcomes included compliance and study completion rate. Results: Screening of 1569 titles and abstracts yielded 7 single-center prospective studies with 223 patients (range n = 9-69 per study, average age 66-74 years) undergoing oncological, cardiovascular, or orthopedic surgery. The median MINORS scores were 13.5 of 16 for 6 studies without control group, and 14 of 24 for 1 study with a control group. Telemonitoring interventions were rated as "easy to use" by 89% to 95% of participants in 3 studies. Patients in 3 studies were satisfied with the eHealth intervention and would recommend it to others. Acceptability (derived from consent rate) ranged from 71% to 89%, compliance from 53% to 86%, and completion of study follow-up from 54% to 95%. Conclusions and Implications: Results of 7 studies involving perioperative eHealth interventions suggest their feasibility and encourage further development of technologies for older surgical patients. Future feasibility studies require clear definitions of appropriate feasibility outcome measures and a comprehensive description of patient characteristics such as functional performance, level of education, and socioeconomic status. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:1844 / +
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Acceptability of digital health interventions in perioperative care: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of clinician perspectives
    Ahmed, Amal
    Ho, Chik Wai
    Grant, Yasmin
    Archer, Stephanie
    Carrington, Emma, V
    BMJ OPEN, 2025, 15 (03):
  • [32] eHealth-Integrated Psychosocial and Physical Interventions forChronic Pain in Older Adults:Scoping Review
    De Lucia, Annalisa
    Perlini, Cinzia
    Chiarotto, Alessandro
    Pachera, Sara
    Pasini, Ilenia
    Del Piccolo, Lidia
    Donisi, Valeria
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2024, 26
  • [33] EHealth Technologies in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review
    Jackson, Belinda D.
    Gray, Kathleen
    Knowles, Simon R.
    De Cruz, Peter
    JOURNAL OF CROHNS & COLITIS, 2016, 10 (09) : 1103 - 1121
  • [34] eHealth for Addressing Balance Disorders in the Elderly: Systematic Review
    Gaspar, Andrea G. Martins
    Lapao, Luis Velez
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (04)
  • [35] Patient-facing e-health interventions to promote self-management in adult surgical patients: A scoping review
    Williams, Cory James
    Woods, Leanna
    Tannagan, Chloe
    Duff, Jed
    PERIOPERATIVE CARE AND OPERATING ROOM MANAGEMENT, 2024, 35
  • [36] A systematic review on the implementation of eHealth interventions for informal caregivers of people with dementia
    Christie, Hannah L.
    Bartels, Sara L.
    Boots, Lizzy M. M.
    Tange, Huibert J.
    Verhey, Frans R. J.
    de Vugt, Marjolein E.
    INTERNET INTERVENTIONS-THE APPLICATION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN MENTAL AND BEHAVIOURAL HEALTH, 2018, 13 : 51 - 59
  • [37] The use of eHealth interventions among persons experiencing homelessness: A systematic review
    Polillo, Alexia
    Gran-Ruaz, Sophia
    Sylvestre, John
    Kerman, Nick
    DIGITAL HEALTH, 2021, 7
  • [38] A Review of Usability Evaluation Methods and Their Use for Testing eHealth HIV Interventions
    Davis, Rindcy
    Gardner, Jessica
    Schnall, Rebecca
    CURRENT HIV/AIDS REPORTS, 2020, 17 (03) : 203 - 218
  • [39] Dyadic Psychosocial eHealth Interventions: Systematic Scoping Review
    Shaffer, Kelly M.
    Tigershtrom, Ashley
    Badr, Hoda
    Benvengo, Stephanie
    Hernandez, Marisol
    Ritterband, Lee M.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2020, 22 (03)
  • [40] Motivational interviewing in eHealth and telehealth interventions for weight loss: A systematic review
    Patel, Michele L.
    Wakayama, Lindsay N.
    Bass, Michelle B.
    Breland, Jessica Y.
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2019, 126