Model-Based Diagnosis of Multi-Agent Systems: A Survey

被引:0
作者
Kalech, Meir [1 ]
Natan, Avraham [1 ]
机构
[1] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, IL-84105 Beer Sheva, Israel
来源
THIRTY-SIXTH AAAI CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE / THIRTY-FOURTH CONFERENCE ON INNOVATIVE APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE / TWELVETH SYMPOSIUM ON EDUCATIONAL ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | 2022年
关键词
FAULT-DIAGNOSIS; SOFTWARE; ALGORITHMS; AGENTS; PLANS; TEAMS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
As systems involving multiple agents are increasingly deployed, there is a growing need to diagnose failures in such systems. Model-Based Diagnosis (MBD) is a well known AI technique to diagnose faults in systems. In this approach, a model of the diagnosed system is given, and the real system is observed. A failure is announced when the real system's output contradicts the model's expected output. The model then is used to deduce the defective components that explain the unexpected observation. MBD has been increasingly being deployed in distributed and multi-agent systems. In this survey, we summarize twenty years of research in the field of model-based diagnosis algorithms for MAS diagnosis. We depict three attributes that should be considered when examining MAS diagnosis: (1) The objective of the diagnosis. Either diagnosing faults in the MAS plans or diagnosing coordination faults. (2) Centralized vs. distributed. The diagnosis method could be applied either by a centralized agent or by the agents in a distributed manner. (3) Temporal vs. non temporal. Temporal diagnosis is used to diagnose the MAS's temporal behaviors, whereas non-temporal diagnosis is used to diagnose the conduct based on a single observation. We survey diverse studies in MBD of MAS based on these attributes, and provide novel research challenges in this field for the AI community.
引用
收藏
页码:12334 / 12341
页数:8
相关论文
共 63 条
  • [41] Diagnosing Delays in Multi-Agent Plans Execution
    Micalizio, Roberto
    Torta, Gianluca
    [J]. 20TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (ECAI 2012), 2012, 242 : 594 - 599
  • [42] Cooperative Monitoring to Diagnose Multiagent Plans
    Micalizio, Roberto
    Torasso, Pietro
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RESEARCH, 2014, 51 : 1 - 70
  • [43] Natan A., 2020, 31 INT WORKSH PRINC
  • [44] Decentralized cooperative policy for conflict resolution in multivehicle systems
    Pallottino, Lucia
    Scordio, Vincenzo G.
    Bicchi, Antonio
    Frazzoli, Emilio
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ROBOTICS, 2007, 23 (06) : 1170 - 1183
  • [45] Parker Lynne E., 2012, Handbook on Collective Robotics: Fundamentals and Challenges
  • [46] Passos L. S., 2015, 24 INT JOINT C ART I
  • [47] An automated teamwork infrastructure for heterogeneous software agents and humans
    Pynadath, DV
    Tambe, M
    [J]. AUTONOMOUS AGENTS AND MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS, 2003, 7 (1-2) : 71 - 100
  • [48] A New Local-Model-Based Distributed Fault Diagnosis Scheme for Multi-Agent Systems with Actuator Faults
    Qin, Liguo
    He, Xiao
    Zhou, Donghua
    Cui, Jian
    Li, Fei
    Wang, Guo
    [J]. IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2018, 51 (24): : 292 - 299
  • [49] Rehák M, 2005, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT, V3690, P470
  • [50] A THEORY OF DIAGNOSIS FROM 1ST PRINCIPLES
    REITER, R
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1987, 32 (01) : 57 - 95