Model-Based Diagnosis of Multi-Agent Systems: A Survey

被引:0
作者
Kalech, Meir [1 ]
Natan, Avraham [1 ]
机构
[1] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, IL-84105 Beer Sheva, Israel
来源
THIRTY-SIXTH AAAI CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE / THIRTY-FOURTH CONFERENCE ON INNOVATIVE APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE / TWELVETH SYMPOSIUM ON EDUCATIONAL ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | 2022年
关键词
FAULT-DIAGNOSIS; SOFTWARE; ALGORITHMS; AGENTS; PLANS; TEAMS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
As systems involving multiple agents are increasingly deployed, there is a growing need to diagnose failures in such systems. Model-Based Diagnosis (MBD) is a well known AI technique to diagnose faults in systems. In this approach, a model of the diagnosed system is given, and the real system is observed. A failure is announced when the real system's output contradicts the model's expected output. The model then is used to deduce the defective components that explain the unexpected observation. MBD has been increasingly being deployed in distributed and multi-agent systems. In this survey, we summarize twenty years of research in the field of model-based diagnosis algorithms for MAS diagnosis. We depict three attributes that should be considered when examining MAS diagnosis: (1) The objective of the diagnosis. Either diagnosing faults in the MAS plans or diagnosing coordination faults. (2) Centralized vs. distributed. The diagnosis method could be applied either by a centralized agent or by the agents in a distributed manner. (3) Temporal vs. non temporal. Temporal diagnosis is used to diagnose the MAS's temporal behaviors, whereas non-temporal diagnosis is used to diagnose the conduct based on a single observation. We survey diverse studies in MBD of MAS based on these attributes, and provide novel research challenges in this field for the AI community.
引用
收藏
页码:12334 / 12341
页数:8
相关论文
共 63 条
  • [1] Simultaneous debugging of software faults
    Abreu, Rui
    Zoeteweij, Peter
    van Gemund, Arjan J. C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 2011, 84 (04) : 573 - 586
  • [2] Barták R, 2020, AAAI CONF ARTIF INTE, V34, P13602
  • [3] Multi-agent path finding on real robots
    Bartak, Roman
    Svancara, Jiri
    Skopkova, Vera
    Nohejl, David
    Krasicenko, Ivan
    [J]. AI COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 32 (03) : 175 - 189
  • [4] Negotiation in multi-agent systems
    Beer, M
    D'Inverno, M
    Luck, M
    Jennings, N
    Preist, C
    Schroeder, M
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING REVIEW, 1999, 14 (03) : 285 - 290
  • [5] A spectrum of definitions for temporal model-based diagnosis
    Brusoni, V
    Console, L
    Terenziani, P
    Dupre, DT
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1998, 102 (01) : 39 - 79
  • [6] Bunte A, 2019, AAAI CONF ARTIF INTE, P2727
  • [7] Calvaresi D., 2018, P ICAART 1, P224, DOI DOI 10.5220/0006594802240235
  • [8] Cazes D, 2020, AAAI CONF ARTIF INTE, V34, P2766
  • [9] Distributed diagnosis of coupled mobile robots
    Daigle, Matthew
    Koutsoukos, Xenofon
    Biswas, Gautam
    [J]. 2006 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION (ICRA), VOLS 1-10, 2006, : 3787 - +
  • [10] Primary and secondary diagnosis of multi-agent plan execution
    de Jonge, Femke
    Roos, Nico
    Witteveen, Cees
    [J]. AUTONOMOUS AGENTS AND MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS, 2009, 18 (02) : 267 - 294