Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of the Prostate Image Quality and Geometric Distortion of Readout-Segmented Versus Selective-Excitation Accelerated Acquisitions

被引:35
作者
Barth, Borna K. [1 ]
Cornelius, Alexander [2 ]
Nanz, Daniel [1 ]
Eberli, Daniel [3 ]
Donati, Olivio F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich Hosp, Inst Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Cantonal Hosp Aarau, Dept Radiol, Aarau, Switzerland
[3] Univ Zurich Hosp, Dept Urol, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
diffusion-weighted imaging; magnetic resonance imaging; prostate; read out segmented; reduced field of view; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; SINGLE-SHOT; 3; T; CLINICAL-APPLICATION; PEDIATRIC BRAIN; GLEASON SCORE; MR; CANCER; EPI; COEFFICIENT;
D O I
10.1097/RLI.0000000000000184
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective To compare image quality and geometric distortion between readout-segmented diffusion-weighted imaging (rs-DWI) and selective-excitation accelerated reduced-field of view (FOV) DWI (sTX-DWI) of the prostate. Materials and Methods Sixty-five patients underwent 3-T MRI of the prostate including rs-DWI and sTX-DWI (b values, 0, 50, and 1000 seconds/mm(2); FOV, 150 x 150 mm(2) and 77 x150 mm(2) for rs-DWI and sTX-DWI; slice thickness, 3 mm; acquisition time, 8:18 min and 1:37 min for rs-DWI and sTX-DWI). Two readers evaluated aspects of image quality and geometric distortion on a 5-point Likert scale. Quantitative analysis of geometric distortion was assessed by measurements of anteroposterior and left-right diameters and compared to T2-weighted turbo-spin echo sequence using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results There was no significant difference in resolution, capsule demarcation, and zonal anatomy (P = 0.111-0.866). Overall image quality was rated above average by reader 1 (4.09 0.66 and 4.03 0.79; P = 0.433) and reader 2 (3.86 +/- 0.66 and 3.80 +/- 0.74; P = 0.465) for rs-DWI and sTX-DWI. Reader 1 (0.74 +/- 0.67 and 1.17 +/- 0.84; P < 0.001) and reader 2 (0.55 +/- 0.64 and 1.09 +/- 0.95; P < 0.001) rated the level of geometric distortion significantly lower for rs-DWI than sTX-DWI. Readout-segmented DWI (0.9 +/- 2.2 mm) and sTX-DWI (2.1 +/- 3.8 mm) overestimated the anteroposterior diameter of the prostate compared to T2-weighted turbo-spin echo sequence (P < 0.001), the difference being more pronounced for sTX-DWI [ICC, 0.89 (95% confidence interval, 0.83-0.93)] compared to rs-DWI [ICC, 0.96 (95% confidence interval, 0.94-0.96)]. Conclusion Selective-excitation accelerated reduced-FOV DW images (sTX-DWI) of the prostate can be acquired more than 5 times faster than rs-DWI with comparable image quality, at the expense of significantly increased geometric distortion.
引用
收藏
页码:785 / 791
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Cancer Biomarker: Consensus and Recommendations
    不详
    [J]. NEOPLASIA, 2009, 11 (02): : 102 - 125
  • [2] ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Richenberg, Jonathan
    Clements, Richard
    Choyke, Peter
    Verma, Sadhna
    Villeirs, Geert
    Rouviere, Olivier
    Logager, Vibeke
    Futterer, Jurgen J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (04) : 746 - 757
  • [3] Evaluation of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System for the Detection of Prostate Cancer by the Results of Targeted Biopsy of the Prostate
    Baur, Alexander D. J.
    Maxeiner, Andreas
    Franiel, Tobias
    Kilic, Ergin
    Huppertz, Alexander
    Schwenke, Carsten
    Hamm, Bernd
    Durmus, Tahir
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2014, 49 (06) : 411 - 420
  • [4] Blasche M., 2012, Magnetom Flash, V1, P74
  • [5] Prostate MRI: Evaluating Tumor Volume and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient as Surrogate Biomarkers for Predicting Tumor Gleason Score
    Donati, Olivio F.
    Afaq, Asim
    Vargas, Hebert Alberto
    Mazaheri, Yousef
    Zheng, Junting
    Moskowitz, Chaya S.
    Hricak, Hedvig
    Akin, Oguz
    [J]. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2014, 20 (14) : 3705 - 3711
  • [6] Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness: Assessment with Whole-Lesion Histogram Analysis of the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient
    Donati, Olivio F.
    Mazaheri, Yousef
    Afaq, Asim
    Vargas, Hebert A.
    Zheng, Junting
    Moskowitz, Chaya S.
    Hricak, Hedvig
    Akin, Oguz
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2014, 271 (01) : 143 - 152
  • [7] Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging of Upper Abdominal Organs: Field Strength and Intervendor Variability of Apparent Diffusion Coefficients
    Donati, Olivio F.
    Chong, Daniel
    Nanz, Daniel
    Boss, Andreas
    Froehlich, Johannes M.
    Andres, Erik
    Seifert, Burkhardt
    Thoeny, Harriet C.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2014, 270 (02) : 454 - 463
  • [8] Relationship between Apparent Diffusion Coefficients at 3.0-T MR Imaging and Gleason Grade in Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer
    Hambrock, Thomas
    Somford, Diederik M.
    Huisman, Henkjan J.
    van Oort, Inge M.
    Witjes, J. Alfred
    Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, Christina A.
    Scheenen, Thomas
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2011, 259 (02) : 453 - 461
  • [9] Noise measurement and estimation in MR imaging experiments
    Heverhagen, Johannes T.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2007, 245 (03) : 638 - 639
  • [10] Clinical Application of Readout-Segmented-Echo-Planar Imaging for Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Pediatric Brain
    Holdsworth, S. J.
    Yeom, K.
    Skare, S.
    Gentles, A. J.
    Barnes, P. D.
    Bammer, R.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2011, 32 (07) : 1274 - 1279