Oculomotor selection underlies feature retention in visual working memory

被引:43
作者
Hanning, Nina M. [1 ,2 ]
Jonikaitis, Donatas [1 ]
Deubel, Heiner [1 ]
Szinte, Martin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Dept Psychol, Allgemeine & Expt Psychol, D-80802 Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Munich, Dept Biol, Grad Sch Syst Neurosci, Planegg Martinsried, Germany
关键词
saccade; working memory; task relevance; visual feature; FRONTAL EYE FIELD; MAINTENANCE; INTERFERENCE; RECOGNITION; INFORMATION; RESOURCES; ATTENTION; SIGNALS;
D O I
10.1152/jn.00927.2015
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Oculomotor selection, spatial task relevance, and visual working memory (WM) are described as three processes highly intertwined and sustained by similar cortical structures. However, because task-relevant locations always constitute potential saccade targets, no study so far has been able to distinguish between oculomotor selection and spatial task relevance. We designed an experiment that allowed us to dissociate in humans the contribution of task relevance, oculomotor selection, and oculomotor execution to the retention of feature representations in WM. We report that task relevance and oculomotor selection lead to dissociable effects on feature WM maintenance. In a first task, in which an object's location was encoded as a saccade target, its feature representations were successfully maintained in WM, whereas they declined at nonsaccade target locations. Likewise, we observed a similar WM benefit at the target of saccades that were prepared but never executed. In a second task, when an object's location was marked as task relevant but constituted a nonsaccade target (a location to avoid), feature representations maintained at that location did not benefit. Combined, our results demonstrate that oculomotor selection is consistently associated with WM, whereas task relevance is not. This provides evidence for an overlapping circuitry serving saccade target selection and feature-based WM that can be dissociated from processes encoding task-relevant locations.
引用
收藏
页码:1071 / 1076
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Feature Binding of Sequentially Presented Stimuli in Visual Working Memory
    Bharti, Anuj Kumar
    Yadav, Sandeep Kumar
    Jaswal, Snehlata
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [22] The Role of the Oculomotor System in Updating Visual-Spatial Working Memory across Saccades
    Boon, Paul J.
    Belopolsky, Artem V.
    Theeuwes, Jan
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (09):
  • [23] Insights into visual working memory precision at the feature- and object-level from a hemispheric encoding manipulation
    Weber, Elena M. Galeano
    Keglovits, Haley
    Fisher, Arin
    Bunge, Silvia A.
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 73 (11) : 1949 - 1968
  • [24] Selection within visual memory representations activates the oculomotor system
    Belopolsky, Artem V.
    Theeuwes, Jan
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2011, 49 (06) : 1605 - 1610
  • [25] Disruption of visual feature binding in working memory
    Taiji Ueno
    Richard J. Allen
    Alan D. Baddeley
    Graham J. Hitch
    Satoru Saito
    Memory & Cognition, 2011, 39 : 12 - 23
  • [26] Different Cortical Mechanisms for Spatial vs. Feature-Based Attentional Selection in Visual Working Memory
    Heuer, Anna
    Schuboe, Anna
    Crawford, J. D.
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 10
  • [27] Decoding the status of working memory representations in preparation of visual selection
    de Vries, Ingmar E. J.
    van Driel, Joram
    Olivers, Christian N. L.
    NEUROIMAGE, 2019, 191 : 549 - 559
  • [28] Selection of Visual Objects in Perception and Working Memory One at a Time
    Thigpen, Nina
    Petro, Nathan M.
    Oschwald, Jessica
    Oberauer, Klaus
    Keil, Andreas
    PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 30 (09) : 1259 - 1272
  • [29] A neural model of retrospective attention in visual working memory
    Bays, Paul M.
    Taylor, Robert
    COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 100 : 43 - 52
  • [30] The Search for Oculomotor Inhibition Interactions with Working Memory
    Van der Stigchel, Stefan
    EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 57 (06) : 429 - 435