Developmental Systems of Students' Personal Theories About Education

被引:16
作者
Barger, Michael M. [1 ,3 ]
Linnenbrink-Garcia, Lisa [2 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Dept Psychol & Neurosci, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dept Counseling Educ Psychol & Special Educ, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Urbana, IL USA
关键词
ACADEMIC SELF-CONCEPT; EXPECTANCY-VALUE THEORY; IMPLICIT THEORIES; EPISTEMOLOGICAL BELIEFS; EPISTEMIC BELIEFS; ACHIEVEMENT-MOTIVATION; ONTOLOGICAL COGNITION; CONSTRUCT-VALIDATION; SCHOOL-ACHIEVEMENT; DOMAIN-SPECIFICITY;
D O I
10.1080/00461520.2016.1252264
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Children hold many personal theories about education: theories about themselves, knowledge, and the learning process. Personal theories help children predict what their actions will cause, and therefore relate to motivation, self-regulation, and achievement. Researchers typically examine how specific types of personal theories develop independently, but the similarities among personal theories suggest more systematic developmental processes. Accordingly, this article outlines a developmental systems model to organize existing personal theories research. We first identify and define personal theories related to education and then consider the nature of their development as a coherent, hierarchical structure that is shaped through educational experiences. This model provides parsimony while advancing a number of fields by providing clarity of concepts, insight across fields, and a better understanding of development and educational outcomes. We conclude by proposing new directions to understand how holistic sets of personal theories change over time and considering implications for educational interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 83
页数:21
相关论文
共 162 条
[21]   The double-edged sword of pedagogy: Instruction limits spontaneous exploration and discovery [J].
Bonawitz, Elizabeth ;
Shafto, Patrick ;
Gweon, Hyowon ;
Goodman, Noah D. ;
Spelke, Elizabeth ;
Schulz, Laura .
COGNITION, 2011, 120 (03) :322-330
[22]   Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really? [J].
Bong, M ;
Skaalvik, EM .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2003, 15 (01) :1-40
[23]   The relationship between epistemological beliefs, implicit theories of intelligence, and self-regulated learning among Norwegian postsecondary students [J].
Bråten, I ;
Stromso, HI .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 75 :539-565
[24]   Epistemological beliefs and implicit theories of intelligence as predictors of achievement goals [J].
Bråten, I ;
Stromso, HI .
CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 29 (04) :371-388
[25]  
Bronfenbrenner U., 1979, The ecology of human development: experiments by nature and design
[26]  
Buehl M.M., 2006, INT J EDUC RES, V45, P28, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.IJER.2006.08.007
[27]   Motivation and performance differences in students domain-specific epistemological belief profiles [J].
Buehl, Michelle M. ;
Alexander, Patricia A. .
AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2005, 42 (04) :697-726
[28]   Mind-Sets Matter: A Meta-Analytic Review of Implicit Theories and Self-Regulation [J].
Burnette, Jeni L. ;
O'Boyle, Ernest H. ;
VanEpps, Eric M. ;
Pollack, Jeffrey M. ;
Finkel, Eli J. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2013, 139 (03) :655-701
[29]   Personal epistemology and theory of mind: deciphering young children's beliefs about knowledge and knowing [J].
Burr, JE ;
Hofer, BK .
NEW IDEAS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 20 (2-3) :199-224
[30]   On the structure of social self-concept for pre-, early, and late adolescents: A test of the Shavelson, Hubner, and Stanton (1976) model [J].
Byrne, BM ;
Shavelson, RJ .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 70 (03) :599-613