Ex-vivo MR imaging of liver intracellular contrast agents

被引:2
作者
Mascalchi, M
Jin, XN
Agen, C
Petruzzi, P
Nardini, D
Tessa, C
Caramella, D
Bartolozzi, C
机构
[1] BEIJING TIANTAN HOSP,CAPITAL MED INST,BEIJING,PEOPLES R CHINA
[2] UNIV PISA,IST FARMACOL,I-56126 PISA,ITALY
关键词
contrast media; experimental studies; Gd-BOPTA; dextran magnetite; liver; Gadobenate dimeglumine;
D O I
10.1016/S0730-725X(96)02007-3
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The objective is to evaluate whether an ex-vivo model can be used to test intracellular contrast agents for MR imaging of the liver. T1 weighted inversion recovery, proton density spin echo and T2* weighted gradient echo images of the liver were acquired at 0.5 T in 10 rats before and 30 min after intravenous injection of 0.075 mmol/kg Gadolinium benzyloxypropionictetraacetate (Gd-BOPTA, n = 5) or 0.015 mmol/kg dextran magnetite (DM, n = 5), Four additional animals served as controls. After exsanguination and perfusion with saline and formalin, specimens of the liver and brain were embedded in an agar gel and examined with MR imaging one to three weeks later using the same protocol. Zn-vivo, the mean liver signal enhancement caused by Gd-BOPTA in T1, proton density and T2* weighted images was +23%, +28% and -70%, respectively. The mean liver signal enhancement caused by DM was -71%, -76% and -94%. In-vitro, no signal change was seen in the brain of animals injected with Gd-BOPTA and DM as compared to controls. Liver signal was increased by Gd-BOPTA and decreased by DM. Mean liver enhancement rate induced by Gd-BOPTA was +22%, +5% and +27% for T1, proton density and T2* weighted images, respectively. Mean liver enhancement rate induced by DM was -27%, -19% and -31%. MR imaging signal changes induced by liver intracellular contrast agents are still appreciable in an ex-vivo model. The latter might be useful for for preliminary investigation of intracellular contrast agents for MR imaging of the liver. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:469 / 474
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   INTERACTIONS OF PARAMAGNETIC CONTRAST AGENTS AND THE SPIN-ECHO PULSE SEQUENCE [J].
DAVIS, PL ;
PARKER, DL ;
NELSON, JA ;
GILLEN, JS ;
RUNGE, VM .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1988, 23 (05) :381-388
[2]  
ELSTER AD, 1994, AM J NEURORADIOL, V15, P1420
[3]   DETECTION AND QUANTITATION IN RAT-TISSUES OF THE SUPERPARAMAGNETIC MAGNETIC-RESONANCE CONTRAST AGENT DEXTRAN MAGNETITE AS DEMONSTRATED BY ELECTRON-SPIN-RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY [J].
IANNONE, A ;
FEDERICO, M ;
TOMASI, A ;
MAGIN, RL ;
CASASCO, A ;
CALLIGARO, A ;
VANNINI, V .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1992, 27 (06) :450-455
[4]   DIFFERENTIATION OF HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMAS FROM HYPERPLASTIC NODULES INDUCED IN RAT-LIVER WITH FERRITE-ENHANCED MR IMAGING [J].
KAWAMORI, Y ;
MATSUI, O ;
KADOYA, M ;
YOSHIKAWA, J ;
DEMACHI, H ;
TAKASHIMA, T .
RADIOLOGY, 1992, 183 (01) :65-72
[5]   ENHANCEMENT OF TUMOR-LIVER CONTRAST-TO-NOISE RATIO WITH GADOBENATE DIMEGLUMINE IN MR-IMAGING OF RATS [J].
KREFT, BP ;
TANIMOTO, A ;
STARK, DD ;
BABA, Y ;
ZHAO, LH ;
CHEN, JT ;
COMPTON, CC ;
FINN, JP ;
CAVAGNA, FM .
JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1993, 3 (01) :41-49
[6]   DEXTRAN MAGNETITE AS A LIVER CONTRAST AGENT [J].
MAGIN, RL ;
BACIC, G ;
NIESMAN, MR ;
ALAMEDA, JC ;
WRIGHT, SM ;
SWARTZ, HM .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1991, 20 (01) :1-16
[7]   QUANTITATION OF MR RELAXATION EFFECTS OF IRON-OXIDE PARTICLES IN LIVER AND SPLEEN [J].
MAJUMDAR, S ;
ZOGHBI, S ;
POPE, CF ;
GORE, JC .
RADIOLOGY, 1988, 169 (03) :653-655
[8]   COMPARISON OF GD-BOPTA WITH GD-DTPA IN MR IMAGING OF RAT-LIVER [J].
PAVONE, P ;
PATRIZIO, G ;
BUONI, C ;
TETTAMANTI, E ;
PASSARIELLO, R ;
MUSU, C ;
TIRONE, P ;
FELDER, E .
RADIOLOGY, 1990, 176 (01) :61-64
[9]   IMPROVED METHOD FOR INVIVO MAGNETIC-RESONANCE CONTRAST-MEDIA RESEARCH [J].
SCHMIEDL, UP ;
MARAVILLA, KR ;
NELSON, JA .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1991, 26 (01) :65-70
[10]   LIVER-LESION TISSUE CONTRAST ON MR IMAGES - EFFECT OF IRON-OXIDE CONCENTRATION AND MAGNETIC-FIELD STRENGTH [J].
THICKMAN, D ;
HENDRICK, RE ;
JERJIAN, KA ;
SCHANKER, CS .
RADIOLOGY, 1990, 176 (02) :557-562