PCQ: Preferred Comfort Questionnaires for product design

被引:14
作者
Anjani, Shabila [1 ]
Kuhne, Manon [2 ]
Naddeo, Alessandro [3 ]
Frohriep, Susanne [4 ]
Mansfield, Neil [5 ]
Song, Yu [1 ]
Vink, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Ind Design Engn, Landbergstr 15, NL-2628 CE Delft, Netherlands
[2] Vhp Human Performance, The Hague, Netherlands
[3] Univ Salerno, Dept Ind Engn, Salerno, Italy
[4] Grammer AG, Amberg, Germany
[5] Nottingham Trent Univ, Dept Engn, Nottingham, England
来源
WORK-A JOURNAL OF PREVENTION ASSESSMENT & REHABILITATION | 2021年 / 68卷
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Comfort; discomfort; questionnaire; product design; research; RATING-SCALES; PAIN-INTENSITY; DISCOMFORT; VALIDITY; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.3233/WOR-208002
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Selecting the most suitable questionnaire(s) in comfort research for product design is always a challenge, even for experienced researchers. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this research is to create a list of Preferred Comfort Questionnaires (PCQ) for product design to help researchers in the selection of questionnaires for comfort research. METHODS: Fifteen questionnaires that are often used in comfort research for product design were selected as candidate questionnaires. During the Second International Comfort Congress (ICC 2019), 55 researchers and practitioners working in the field of comfort joined together in a workshop to rate these questionnaires individually as well as rank them in groups based on their experience. The criteria of rating and ranking included easiness to answer, easiness for data interpretation, time needed to complete, the need for prior training, as well as mapping the applicable design phases and field of application. RESULTS: The elicited responses related to each questionnaire were analyzed. For comfort research in five proposed application fields and four design phases, the preferred questionnaires were highlighted and categorized into four categories: preferred questionnaire, suitable for less prior training, suitable for fast completion and generally applicable, which led to a list of PCQ for product design. CONCLUSION: We expect that the PCQ list can be used as a useful instrument to help researchers in selecting questionnaires for comfort research in product design.
引用
收藏
页码:S19 / S28
页数:10
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Cultural adaptation and reliability of the General Comfort Questionnaire for chronic renal patients in Brazil [J].
Alencar Melo, Georgia Alcantara ;
Silva, Renan Alves ;
Fernandes Pereira, Francisco Gilberto ;
Caetano, Joselany Afio .
REVISTA LATINO-AMERICANA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2017, 25
[2]  
American Society of Heating, 2009, 1891P ASHRAE AM SOC, P1
[3]   Subjective rating scales: science or art? [J].
Annett, J .
ERGONOMICS, 2002, 45 (14) :966-987
[4]  
BSI, 2006, 15251 BSI EN
[5]  
Buijs J., 2012, DELFT INNOVATION MET, P120
[6]   The effect of human-mattress interface's temperature on perceived thermal comfort [J].
Califano, R. ;
Naddeo, A. ;
Vink, P. .
APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2017, 58 :334-341
[8]   TECHNIQUE FOR ASSESSING POSTURAL DISCOMFORT [J].
CORLETT, EN ;
BISHOP, RP .
ERGONOMICS, 1976, 19 (02) :175-182
[9]  
De Lille C, 2016, AEGATS 2016
[10]  
Del Walop Greco L, 1987, CMAJ, V136