The economic value of the recreational red abalone fishery in northern California

被引:0
作者
Reid, John [1 ]
Rogers-Bennett, Laura [2 ]
Vasquez, Felipe [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Pace, Maya [1 ]
Catton, Cynthia A. [2 ]
Kashiwada, Jerry V. [6 ]
Taniguchi, Ian K. [7 ]
机构
[1] Conservat Strategy Fund, 7151 Wilton Ave Suite 203, Sebastopol, CA 95472 USA
[2] Calif Dept Fish & Wildlife, Bodega Marine Lab, 2099 Westside Rd, Bodega Bay, CA 94923 USA
[3] Univ Desarrollo, Fac Economia & Negocios, Concepcion, Chile
[4] Univ Concepcion, Ctr Estudio Forzantes Multiples Sistemas So, Ctr Ciencias Ambient EULA, Concepcion, Chile
[5] Univ Concepcion, Res Nucleus Environm, Resource Econom MSI, Concepcion, Chile
[6] Calif Dept Fish & Wildlife, 32330 N Harbor Dr,Ft Bragg, Fort Bragg, CA 95437 USA
[7] Calif Dept Fish & Wildlife, 4665 Lampson Ave, Los Alamitos, CA 90720 USA
来源
CALIFORNIA FISH AND GAME | 2016年 / 102卷 / 03期
关键词
Economic Impact; Haliotis rufescens; Non-Market Value; Socioeconomics; Sport fisheries; Travel Cost Method;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
There is a long tradition of recreational red abalone (Haliotis rufescens) fishing in northern California. The fishery is enjoyed by tens of thousands of fishers along Sonoma and Mendocino counties, but little is known about its economic value. Recreational fisheries are difficult to value because the catch is not sold commercially and the activity is dispersed along the coastline. For this study, we estimated the value to the fishers of the recreational red abalone fishery using the travel-cost estimation method, a non-market valuation approach. Using data for the 2013 season at more than 50 sites, we find that approximately 31,000 fishers derived between $24M and $44M per year of recreational value from the fishery. The lower figure was estimated based solely on fishers' driving costs, while the larger estimate results when also considering the time fishers spent on the activity. Examination of site-level variables influencing the choice made by fishers among the sites shows that key site selection criteria included 1) impacts of a harmful algal bloom in Sonoma County, 2) protection from northwest ocean swell, and 3) presence of amenities such as boat launches and restrooms. We show that the value of the fishery declined nearly $12M after stricter regulations were imposed in 2014 following a harmful algal bloom that killed thousands of abalone in Sonoma County. The economic value of the fishery clearly warrants investment in both the biological and economic sustainability of this important resource.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 130
页数:12
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, AB REC MAN PLAN
[2]  
California Department Of Fish And Wildlife, 2013, TECHNICAL REPORT
[3]   VALUE OF TIME IN RECREATION BENEFIT STUDIES [J].
CESARIO, FJ .
LAND ECONOMICS, 1976, 52 (01) :32-41
[4]  
Chen C., 2013, 09015 CAL SEA GRANT
[5]  
Hackett S. C., 2013, TECHNICAL REPORT
[6]  
Karpov Konstantin A., 2000, Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, V130, P11
[7]  
Kashiwada JV, 2007, J SHELLFISH RES, V26, P713, DOI 10.2983/0730-8000(2007)26[713:AORRAH]2.0.CO
[8]  
2
[9]  
Kildow JudithT., 2005, California's Ocean Economy
[10]  
Leeworthy V. R., 2001, PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE