The Drosophila anatomy ontology

被引:54
作者
Costa, Marta [1 ]
Reeve, Simon [1 ]
Grumbling, Gary [2 ]
Osumi-Sutherland, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Genet, FlyBase, Cambridge, England
[2] Indiana Univ, Dept Biol, FlyBase, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL SEMANTICS | 2013年 / 4卷
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
Drosophila; Anatomy; Ontology; OWL; OBO; Gene Ontology; FlyBase; Description logic; DATABASE; GENOTYPES;
D O I
10.1186/2041-1480-4-32
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Anatomy ontologies are query-able classifications of anatomical structures. They provide a widely-used means for standardising the annotation of phenotypes and expression in both human-readable and programmatically accessible forms. They are also frequently used to group annotations in biologically meaningful ways. Accurate annotation requires clear textual definitions for terms, ideally accompanied by images. Accurate grouping and fruitful programmatic usage requires high-quality formal definitions that can be used to automate classification and check for errors. The Drosophila anatomy ontology (DAO) consists of over 8000 classes with broad coverage of Drosophila anatomy. It has been used extensively for annotation by a range of resources, but until recently it was poorly formalised and had few textual definitions. Results: We have transformed the DAO into an ontology rich in formal and textual definitions in which the majority of classifications are automated and extensive error checking ensures quality. Here we present an overview of the content of the DAO, the patterns used in its formalisation, and the various uses it has been put to. Conclusions: As a result of the work described here, the DAO provides a high-quality, queryable reference for the wild-type anatomy of Drosophila melanogaster and a set of terms to annotate data related to that anatomy. Extensive, well referenced textual definitions make it both a reliable and useful reference and ensure accurate use in annotation. Wide use of formal axioms allows a large proportion of classification to be automated and the use of consistency checking to eliminate errors. This increased formalisation has resulted in significant improvements to the completeness and accuracy of classification. The broad use of both formal and informal definitions make further development of the ontology sustainable and scalable. The patterns of formalisation used in the DAO are likely to be useful to developers of other anatomy ontologies.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [21] Mungall C, OBO FLAT FILE FORMAT
  • [22] Uberon, an integrative multi-species anatomy ontology
    Mungall, Christopher J.
    Torniai, Carlo
    Gkoutos, Georgios V.
    Lewis, Suzanna E.
    Haendel, Melissa A.
    [J]. GENOME BIOLOGY, 2012, 13 (01):
  • [23] Cross-product extensions of the Gene Ontology
    Mungall, Christopher J.
    Bada, Michael
    Berardini, Tanya Z.
    Deegan, Jennifer
    Ireland, Amelia
    Harris, Midori A.
    Hill, David P.
    Lomax, Jane
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2011, 44 (01) : 80 - 86
  • [24] A strategy for building neuroanatomy ontologies
    Osumi-Sutherland, David
    Reeve, Simon
    Mungall, Christopher J.
    Neuhaus, Fabian
    Ruttenberg, Alan
    Jefferis, Gregory S. X. E.
    Armstrong, J. Douglas
    [J]. BIOINFORMATICS, 2012, 28 (09) : 1262 - 1269
  • [25] The Zebrafish Information Network: the zebrafish model organism database provides expanded support for genotypes and phenotypes
    Sprague, Judy
    Bayraktaroglu, Leyla
    Bradford, Yvonne
    Conlin, Tom
    Dunn, Nathan
    Fashena, David
    Frazer, Ken
    Haendel, Melissa
    Howe, Douglas G.
    Knight, Jonathan
    Mani, Prita
    Moxon, Sierra A. T.
    Pich, Christian
    Ramachandran, Sridhar
    Schaper, Kevin
    Segerdell, Erik
    Shao, Xiang
    Singer, Amy
    Song, Peiran
    Sprunger, Brock
    Van Slyke, Ceri E.
    Westerfield, Monte
    [J]. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2008, 36 : D768 - D772