Accounting for the Moral Significance of Technology: Revisiting the Case of Non-Medical Sex Selection

被引:8
|
作者
Kudina, Olya [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Twente, Philosophy Dept, Cubicus C315,Drienerlolaan 5, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
关键词
Sex selection; Technological mediation; Moral mediation; Ethics of technology; EXPERIENCES; CARE;
D O I
10.1007/s11673-018-9891-4
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
This article explores the moral significance of technology, reviewing a microfluidic chip for sperm sorting and its use for non-medical sex selection. I explore how a specific material setting of this new iteration of pre-pregnancy sex selection technology-with a promised low cost, non-invasive nature and possibility to use at home-fosters new and exacerbates existing ethical concerns. I compare this new technology with the existing sex selection methods of sperm sorting and Prenatal Genetic Diagnosis. Current ethical and political debates on emerging technologies predominantly focus on the quantifiable risk-and-benefit logic that invites an unequivocal "either-or" decision on their future and misses the contextual ethical impact of technology. The article aims to deepen the discussion on sex selection and supplement it with the analysis of the new technology's ethical potential to alter human practices, perceptions and the evaluative concepts with which we approach it. I suggest that the technological mediation approach (Verbeek, 2005, 2011) can be useful to ethically contextualize technologies and highlight the value of such considerations for the informed deliberation regarding their use, design and governance.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 85
页数:11
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Accounting for the Moral Significance of Technology: Revisiting the Case of Non-Medical Sex Selection
    Olya Kudina
    Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 2019, 16 : 75 - 85
  • [2] Sex selection for non-medical purposes
    Milliez, J. M.
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2007, 14 : 114 - 117
  • [3] Non-medical sex selection: ethical issues
    Strange, Heather
    BRITISH MEDICAL BULLETIN, 2010, 94 (01) : 7 - 20
  • [4] Ethical objections to sex selection for non-medical reasons
    Blyth, Eric
    Frith, Lucy
    Crawshaw, Marilyn
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2008, 16 : 41 - 45
  • [5] Attitudes towards sex selection for non-medical reasons: a review
    Hall, Sue
    Reid, Erin
    Marteau, Theresa M.
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2006, 26 (07) : 619 - 626
  • [6] Ethical arguments for and against sperm sorting for non-medical sex selection: a review
    Kalfoglou, A. L.
    Kammersell, M.
    Philpott, S.
    Dahl, E.
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2013, 26 (03) : 231 - 239
  • [7] Preconception sex selection for non-medical reasons: a representative survey from Germany
    Dahl, E
    Beutel, M
    Brosig, B
    Hinsch, KD
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2003, 18 (10) : 2231 - 2234
  • [8] ESHRE Task Force on ethics and Law 20: sex selection for non-medical reasons
    Dondorp, W.
    De Wert, G.
    Pennings, G.
    Shenfield, F.
    Devroey, P.
    Tarlatzis, B.
    Barri, P.
    Diedrich, K.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2013, 28 (06) : 1448 - 1454
  • [9] Comparing Non-Medical Sex Selection and Saviour Sibling Selection in the Case of JS and LS v Patient Review Panel: Beyond the Welfare of the Child?
    Malcolm K. Smith
    Michelle Taylor-Sands
    Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 2018, 15 : 139 - 153
  • [10] Comparing Non-Medical Sex Selection and Saviour Sibling Selection in the Case of JS']JS and LS v Patient Review Panel: Beyond the Welfare of the Child?
    Smith, Malcolm K.
    Taylor-Sands, Michelle
    JOURNAL OF BIOETHICAL INQUIRY, 2018, 15 (01) : 139 - 153