Accuracy of speech transmission index predictions based on the reverberation time and signal-to-noise ratio

被引:15
|
作者
Galbrun, Laurent [1 ]
Kitapci, Kivanc [1 ]
机构
[1] Heriot Watt Univ, Sch Built Environm, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
Acoustic measurements; Room acoustics; Speech intelligibility; Sound quality; MODULATION TRANSFER-FUNCTION; MAXIMUM-LENGTH SEQUENCES; ROOM ACOUSTICS; INTELLIGIBILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.apacoust.2014.02.001
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
This paper examines the accuracy of the speech transmission index (STI) calculated from the reverberation time (T) and signal-to-noise ratio (L-SN) of enclosed spaces. Differences between measured and predicted STIs have been analysed in two rooms (reverberant vs. absorbent), for a wide range of absorption conditions and signal-to-noise ratios (sixteen tests). The STI was measured using maximum length sequence analysis and predictions were calculated using either measured or predicted values of T and L-SN, the latter assuming diffuse sound field conditions. The results obtained for all the conditions tested showed that STI predictions based on T and L-SN tend to underestimate the STI, with differences between measured and predicted SIN always lower than 0.1 (on a 0.0-1.0 scale), and on average lower than 0.06. According to previous research, these differences are noticeable and therefore non-negligible, as 0.03 is the just noticeable difference in STI. The use of either measured or predicted values of T and L-SN provided similar STI predictions (i.e. non-noticeable changes), with differences between predictions that are on average lower than 0.03 for the absorbent room, and lower than 0.01 for the reverberant room. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effect of varying corridor parameters on signal-to-noise ratio in classrooms
    Song, Hengling
    ACOUSTICAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 44 (02) : 110 - 119
  • [22] SPEECH TEMPORAL DYNAMICS FUSION APPROACHES FOR NOISE-ROBUST REVERBERATION TIME ESTIMATION
    Senoussaoui, Mohammed
    Santos, Joao F.
    Falk, Tiago H.
    2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH AND SIGNAL PROCESSING (ICASSP), 2017, : 5545 - 5549
  • [23] The analysis of the simplification from the ideal ratio to binary mask in signal-to-noise ratio sense
    Liang, Shan
    Liu, WenJu
    Jiang, Wei
    Xue, Wei
    SPEECH COMMUNICATION, 2014, 59 : 22 - 30
  • [24] Conversational speech levels and signal-to-noise ratios in realistic acoustic conditions
    Weisser, Adam
    Buchholz, Jorg M.
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2019, 145 (01) : 349 - 360
  • [25] Noise spectra for calculation the speech transmission index in public address systems
    Dziechcinski, Pawel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRONICS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 70 (03) : 555 - 562
  • [26] Toward a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of masker type and signal-to-noise ratio on the pupillary response while performing a speech-in-noise test
    Wendt, Dorothea
    Koelewijn, Thomas
    Ksiazek, Patrycja
    Kramer, Sophia E.
    Lunner, Thomas
    HEARING RESEARCH, 2018, 369 : 67 - 78
  • [27] Estimating the image spectrum signal-to-noise ratio for imaging through scattering media
    Hanafy, Mohamed E.
    Roggemann, Michael C.
    Guney, Durdu O.
    OPTICAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 54 (01)
  • [28] Impact of Background Noise Fluctuation and Reverberation on Response Time in a Speech Reception Task
    Prodi, Nicola
    Visentin, Chiara
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2019, 62 (11): : 4179 - 4195
  • [29] Blind estimation of speech transmission index and room acoustic parameters based on the extended model of room impulse response
    Duangpummet, Suradej
    Karnjana, Jessada
    Kongprawechnon, Waree
    Unoki, Masashi
    APPLIED ACOUSTICS, 2022, 185
  • [30] The modulation transfer function and signal-to-noise ratio of different digital filters: a technical approach
    Bruellmann, D. D.
    d'Hoedt, B.
    DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2011, 40 (04) : 222 - 229