Graft Survival Versus Glaucoma Treatment After Penetrating or Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty

被引:27
|
作者
Ward, Matthew S. [1 ]
Goins, Kenneth M. [1 ]
Greiner, Mark A. [1 ]
Kitzmann, Anna S. [1 ]
Sutphin, John E. [1 ,2 ]
Alward, Wallace L. M. [1 ]
Greenlee, Emily C. [1 ]
Kwon, Young H. [1 ]
Zimmerman, M. Bridget [3 ]
Wagoner, Michael D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Iowa City, IA USA
[2] Univ Kansas, Med Ctr, Dept Ophthalmol, Kansas City, KS 66103 USA
[3] Univ Iowa, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Iowa City, IA USA
关键词
penetrating keratoplasty; Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty; graft survival; glaucoma treatment; RISK-FACTORS; INTRAOCULAR-PRESSURE; ANTIGLAUCOMA DRUGS; EYES; ESCALATION; FAILURE; MANAGEMENT; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1097/ICO.0000000000000170
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess and compare the association of glaucoma therapy with graft survival after performing penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed of cases: primary PKP from January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2005, or primary DSAEK from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2008. Eyes with a surgical indication of pseudophakic corneal edema were included in the statistical analysis. Eyes were stratified by glaucoma treatment into those with (1) no glaucoma treatment, (2) medical therapy only, or (3) surgical intervention. The main outcome measure was graft survival. Results: Fifty-seven PKP-operated and 156 DSAEK-operated eyes met the inclusion criteria. After PKP and DSAEK, respectively, the 5-year Kaplan-Meier graft survival was 94.7% and 93.8% in eyes with no glaucoma treatment (P > 0.99), 93.8% and 96.3% in eyes with medical therapy only (P > 0.99), and 56.8% and 50% in eyes with surgical intervention (P > 0.99). After both procedures were performed, graft survival was significantly worse in eyes with surgical intervention compared with that in eyes with no glaucoma treatment (P< 0.0001) or in eyes with medical therapy alone (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: PKP and DSAEK have comparable graft survival in eyes without glaucoma management and in those with comparable glaucoma management.
引用
收藏
页码:785 / 789
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Descemet's Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty Five-Year Graft Survival and Endothelial Cell Loss
    Price, Marianne O.
    Fairchild, Kelly M.
    Price, David A.
    Price, Francis W., Jr.
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2011, 118 (04) : 725 - 729
  • [32] Comparison of outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty versus Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for penetrating keratoplasty graft failure due to corneal edema
    Anna S. Kitzmann
    George R. Wandling
    John E. Sutphin
    Kenneth M. Goins
    Michael D. Wagoner
    International Ophthalmology, 2012, 32 : 15 - 23
  • [33] Factors associated with graft survival and endothelial cell density after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty
    Ishii, Nobuhito
    Yamaguchi, Takefumi
    Yazu, Hiroyuki
    Satake, Yoshiyuki
    Yoshida, Akitoshi
    Shimazaki, Jun
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2016, 6
  • [34] Effect of Incision Width on Graft Survival and Endothelial Cell Loss After Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty
    Price, Marianne O.
    Bidros, Maria
    Gorovoy, Mark
    Price, Francis W., Jr.
    Benetz, Beth A.
    Menegay, Harry J.
    Debanne, Sara M.
    Lass, Jonathan H.
    CORNEA, 2010, 29 (05) : 523 - 527
  • [35] Elevated Intraocular Pressure in Patients Undergoing Penetrating Keratoplasty and Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty
    Sandhu, Sartaj
    Petsoglou, Constantinos
    Grigg, John
    Veillard, Anne-Sophie
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2016, 25 (04) : 390 - 396
  • [36] Graft Rejection After Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Graft Survival and Endothelial Cell Loss
    Li, Jennifer Y.
    Terry, Mark A.
    Goshe, Jeffrey
    Shamie, Neda
    Davis-Boozer, David
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 119 (01) : 90 - 94
  • [37] Outcomes of rebubbling for graft detachment after Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty or Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty
    Bhalerao, Sushank A.
    Mohamed, Ashik
    Vaddavalli, Pravin K.
    Murthy, Somasheila, I
    Reddy, Jagadesh C.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 68 (01) : 48 - 53
  • [38] Comparison of outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty versus Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for penetrating keratoplasty graft failure due to corneal edema
    Kitzmann, Anna S.
    Wandling, George R.
    Sutphin, John E.
    Goins, Kenneth M.
    Wagoner, Michael D.
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 32 (01) : 15 - 23
  • [39] Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty After Failed Penetrating Keratoplasty Survival, Rejection Risk, and Visual Outcome
    Mitry, Danny
    Bhogal, Maninder
    Patel, Amit K.
    Lee, Bryan S.
    Chai, Shu Ming
    Price, Marianne O.
    Price, Francis W., Jr.
    Jun, Albert S.
    Aldave, Anthony J.
    Mehta, Jodhbir S.
    Busin, Massimo
    Allan, Bruce D.
    JAMA OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 132 (06) : 742 - 749
  • [40] Retrospective Review of Graft Dislocation Rate Associated With Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty After Primary Failed Penetrating Keratoplasty
    Clements, John L.
    Bouchard, Charles S.
    Lee, W. Barry
    Dunn, Steven P.
    Mannis, Mark J.
    Reidy, James J.
    John, Thomas
    Hannush, Sadeer B.
    Goins, Kenneth M.
    Wagoner, Michael D.
    Adi, Marwa A.
    Rubenstein, Jonathan B.
    Udell, Ira J.
    Babiuch, Amy S.
    CORNEA, 2011, 30 (04) : 414 - 418