Optimal balloon positioning for the proximal optimization technique? An experimental bench study

被引:20
作者
Derimay, Francois [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Rioufol, Gilles [1 ,2 ]
Nishi, Takeshi [3 ,4 ]
Kobayashi, Yuhei [3 ,4 ]
Fearon, William F. [3 ,4 ]
Veziers, Joelle [5 ]
Guerin, Patrice [5 ]
Finet, Gerard [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Cardiovasc Hosp, Dept Intervent Cardiol, Lyon, France
[2] INSERM, U1060, CARMEN, Lyon, France
[3] Stanford Univ, Med Ctr, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[4] Palo Alto VA Hlth Care Syst, Stanford, CA USA
[5] CHU Nantes, PHU4 OTONN, F-44093 Nantes, France
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.05.041
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims: The proximal optimization technique (POT) in coronary bifurcation stenting improves apposition and side-branch obstruction. The POT balloon should be positioned with the distal radio-opaque marker at the carina cut plane. However, the real impact of positioning remains unknown. Methods and results: Synergy (TM) stents (Boston Scientific, USA) were implanted on left-main fractal bench models. Initial POT was performed in 3 positions according to distal shoulder position (loss of balloon parallelism) relative to the carina cut plane (n = 5/group): i) "proximal", 1 mm before carina; ii) "medium", just at carina; iii) "distal", 1 mm after carina. Results were quantified on 2D- and 3D-OCT. Compared to implantation, initial POT improved malapposition in all positions ("proximal": 61.5 +/- 1.4% vs. 5.1 +/- 2.7%; "medium": 60.2 +/- 2.4% vs. 1.3 +/- 0.6%; "distal": 60.5 +/- 2.9% vs. 1.1 +/- 1.8%, p < 0.05). However, residual malapposition was greater in "proximal" position (p < 0.05). "Proximal", unlike "medium" or "distal" POT, also failed to improve side-branch obstruction. Conversely, "distal" POT significantly overstretched the main-branch ostium, with stent/artery ratio 1.22 +/- 0.04 vs. 1.11 +/- 0.07 for "medium" POT (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Shoulder positioning is essential to optimize the mechanical benefit of POT without main-branch overstretch (too distal position). Experimentally, the best position is just at the carina cut plane ("medium"). (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 97
页数:3
相关论文
共 6 条
[1]  
Derimay F, 2018, INT J CARDIOL
[2]   Benefit of a new provisional stenting strategy, the re-proximal optimisation technique: the rePOT clinical study [J].
Derimay, Francois ;
Finet, Gerard ;
Souteyrand, Geraud ;
Maillard, Luc ;
Aminian, Adel ;
Lattuca, Benoit ;
Cayla, Guillaume ;
Cellier, Guillaume ;
Motreff, Pascal ;
Rioufol, Gilles .
EUROINTERVENTION, 2018, 14 (03) :325-332
[3]   Comparative Analysis of Sequential Proximal Optimizing Technique Versus Kissing Balloon Inflation Technique in Provisional Bifurcation Stenting Fractal Coronary Bifurcation Bench Test [J].
Finet, Gerard ;
Derimay, Francois ;
Motreff, Pascal ;
Guerin, Patrice ;
Pilet, Paul ;
Ohayon, Jacques ;
Darremont, Olivier ;
Rioufol, Gilles .
JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2015, 8 (10) :1308-1317
[4]   Location of side branch access critically affects results in bifurcation stenting: Insights from bench modeling and computational flow simulation [J].
Foin, N. ;
Torii, R. ;
Alegria, E. ;
Sen, S. ;
Petraco, R. ;
Nijjer, S. ;
Ghione, M. ;
Davies, J. E. ;
Di Mario, C. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 168 (04) :3623-3628
[5]   Percutaneous coronary intervention for the left main stem and other bifurcation lesions: 12th consensus document from the European Bifurcation Club [J].
Lassen, Jens Flensted ;
Burzotta, Francesco ;
Banning, Adrian P. ;
Lefevre, Thierry ;
Darremont, Olivier ;
Hildick-Smith, David ;
Chieffo, Alaide ;
Pan, Manuel ;
Holm, Niels Ramsing ;
Louvard, Yves ;
Stankovic, Goran .
EUROINTERVENTION, 2018, 13 (13) :1540-1553
[6]   Drug-eluting stents for coronary bifurcations: Bench testing of provisional side-branch strategies [J].
Ormiston, JA ;
Webster, MWI ;
El Jack, S ;
Ruygrok, PN ;
Stewart, JT ;
Scott, D ;
Currie, E ;
Panther, MJ ;
Shaw, B ;
O'Shaughnessy, B .
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2006, 67 (01) :49-55