Cochlear Implant Melody Recognition as a Function of Melody Frequency Range, Harmonicity, and Number of Electrodes

被引:31
作者
Singh, Sonya [2 ]
Kong, Ying-Yee [3 ]
Zeng, Fan-Gang [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Anat & Neurobiol, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Sch Med, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[3] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Cognit Sci, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[4] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Biomed Engn, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[5] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
SPEECH RECOGNITION; TEMPORAL CUES; FUNDAMENTAL-FREQUENCY; MUSIC PERCEPTION; VOWEL IDENTIFICATION; PITCH PERCEPTION; STIMULATION RATE; HEARING; DISCRIMINATION; NOISE;
D O I
10.1097/AUD.0b013e31819342b9
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objective: The primary goal of the present study was to determine how cochlear implant melody recognition was affected by the frequency range of the melodies, the harmonicity of these melodies, and the number of activated electrodes. The secondary goal was to investigate whether melody recognition and speech recognition were differentially affected by the limitations imposed by cochlear implant processing. Design: Four experiments were conducted. In the first experiment, 11 cochlear implant users used their clinical processors to recognize melodies of complex harmonic tones with their fundamental frequencies being in the low (104-262 Hz), middle (207-523 Hz), and high (414-1046 Hz) ranges. In the second experiment, melody recognition with pure tones was compared to melody recognition with complex harmonic tones in four subjects. In the third experiment, melody recognition was measured as a function of the number of electrodes in five subjects, In the fourth experiment, vowel and consonant recognition were measured as a function of the number of electrodes in the same five subjects who participated in the third experiment. Results: Frequency range significantly affected cochlear implant melody recognition, with higher frequency ranges producing better performance. Pure tones produced significantly better performance than complex harmonic tones. Increasing the number of activated electrodes did not affect performance with low- and middle-frequency melodies but produced better performance with high-frequency melodies. Large individual variability was observed for melody recognition, but its source seemed to be different from the source of the large variability observed in speech recognition. Conclusion: Contemporary cochlear implants do not adequately encode either temporal pitch or place pitch cues. Melody recognition and speech recognition require different signal processing strategies in future cochlear implants.
引用
收藏
页码:160 / 168
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Acoustic to electric pitch comparisons in cochlear implant subjects with residual hearing [J].
Boëx, Colette ;
Baud, Lionel ;
Cosendai, Grégoire ;
Sigrist, Alain ;
Kós, Maria-Izabel ;
Pelizzone, Marco .
JARO-JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2006, 7 (02) :110-124
[2]   Fundamental frequency discrimination and speech perception in noise in cochlear implant simulations [J].
Carroll, Jeff ;
Zeng, Fan-Gang .
HEARING RESEARCH, 2007, 231 (1-2) :42-53
[3]   On the relative influence of individual harmonics on pitch judgment [J].
Dai, HP .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2000, 107 (02) :953-959
[4]   Place-pitch discrimination of single-versus dual-electrode stimuli by cochlear implant users [J].
Donaldson, GS ;
Kreft, HA ;
Litvak, L .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2005, 118 (02) :623-626
[5]   Relative importance of rate and place: Experiments using pitch scaling techniques with cochlear implant recipients [J].
Fearn, R ;
Wolfe, J .
ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 2000, 109 (12) :51-53
[6]   Speech recognition as a function of the number of electrodes used in the SPEAK cochlear implant speech processor [J].
Fishman, KE ;
Shannon, RV ;
Slattery, WH .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1997, 40 (05) :1201-1215
[7]   Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: Comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants [J].
Friesen, LM ;
Shannon, RV ;
Baskent, D ;
Wang, X .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2001, 110 (02) :1150-1163
[8]  
Garnham Carolyn, 2002, Ear and Hearing, V23, P540, DOI 10.1097/00003446-200212000-00005
[9]   Better place-coding of the fundamental frequency in cochlear implants [J].
Geurts, L ;
Wouters, J .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2004, 115 (02) :844-852
[10]   Coding of the fundamental frequency in continuous interleaved sampling processors for cochlear implants [J].
Geurts, L ;
Wouters, J .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2001, 109 (02) :713-726