Law and economics versus economic analysis of law

被引：2

作者：

Hylton, Keith N. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Boston Univ, Boston, MA 02215 USA

来源：

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF LAW AND ECONOMICS | 2019年 / 48卷 / 01期

关键词：

Law and economics; Economic analysis of law; Legal positivism; Positive economics; Normative economics; Transaction costs; Norms; Behavioral economics; LIABILITY RULES; PROPERTY RULES;

D O I：

10.1007/s10657-018-9580-0

中图分类号：

F [经济];

学科分类号：

02 ;

摘要：

I agree with Calabresi's general distinction between Economic Analysis of Law and Law and Economics. However, these broad categories may obscure important differences between types of law and economics scholarship. I would distinguish positive economic analysis from normative economic analysis, and positivist legal analysis from nonpositivist analysis. The four categories generated by these distinctions provide a more fine-grained map of the styles of reasoning in law and economics, and has implications for the future of law and economics.

引用

页码：77 / 88

页数：12

共 28 条

[1]

[Anonymous], J TORT LAW

[2]

[Anonymous], 1979, COMMENTARIES LAWS EN

[3]

Austin John., 1861, The Province of Jurisprudence Determined, V2nd

[4] CRIME AND PUNISHMENT - ECONOMIC APPROACH [J].