Fischer-Tropsch synthesis: activity and selectivity for Group I alkali promoted iron-based catalysts

被引:147
作者
Ngantsoue-Hoc, W [1 ]
Zhang, YQ [1 ]
O'Brien, RJ [1 ]
Luo, MS [1 ]
Davis, BH [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kentucky, Ctr Appl Energy Res, Lexington, KY 40511 USA
关键词
promoter; alkali; Fischer-Tropsch synthesis; iron catalyst; Group I metal; potassium; lithium; cesium; rubidium;
D O I
10.1016/S0926-860X(02)00278-8
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The impact of the Group I alkali metals upon the activity of iron catalysts has been obtained at medium pressure synthesis conditions and at the same conversion levels. The relative impact of the alkali metal depends upon the conversion level with potassium being the promoter that impacts the highest activity at all conversion levels. At low conversions, Li is nearly as effective as potassium in improving the catalytic activity but is the poorest promoter at high conversion levels. In fact, three alkalis (Li, Cs and Rb) should be viewed as inhibitors since they decrease the catalytic activity for CO conversion below that of the unpromoted iron catalyst. The differences in the impact of the various Group I alkali metals at lower (less than or similar to 40%) conversions are slight but become much greater at higher CO conversion levels. The major differences of the alkali metals at higher conversion levels is due to the impact of the promoter upon the water-gas-shift (WGS) reaction. At higher conversion levels, with a synthesis gas or "syngas" of H-2/CO = 0.7, the WGS reaction becomes rate controlling because hydrogen production becomes the rate limiting factor in the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis (FTS). The basicity of the promoter appears to be the determining factor for the rate of catalyst deactivation and on the secondary hydrogenation of ethene. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 89
页数:13
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   PROMOTER EFFECTS ON PRECIPITATED IRON CATALYSTS FOR FISCHER-TROPSCH SYNTHESIS [J].
BUKUR, DB ;
MUKESH, D ;
PATEL, SA .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 1990, 29 (02) :194-204
[2]  
Davis B.H., 1998, TECHNOLOGY DEV IRON
[3]  
Douglas B., 1994, CONCEPTS MODELS INOR
[4]   CORRELATION BETWEEN CATALYST SURFACE BASICITY AND HYDROCARBON SELECTIVITY IN FISCHER-TROPSCH SYNTHESIS [J].
DRY, ME ;
OOSTHUIZEN, GJ .
JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS, 1968, 11 (01) :18-+
[5]  
DRY ME, 1981, CATALYSIS SCI TECHNO, V1, P155
[6]  
FISCHER F, 1930, GESAMMELTE ABH KENNT, V10, P333
[7]   Activation study of precipitated iron Fischer-Tropsch catalysts [J].
OBrien, RJ ;
Xu, LG ;
Spicer, RL ;
Davis, BH .
ENERGY & FUELS, 1996, 10 (04) :921-926
[8]  
RAJE A, 1996, ACS PETROL CHEM DIV, V249
[9]  
Raje AP, 1997, STUD SURF SCI CATAL, V111, P527
[10]  
ROPER M, 1983, CATALYSIS C1 CHEM, P41