Standard versus hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: assessing the impact on dose modulation and normal tissue effects when using patient-specific cancer biology

被引:3
|
作者
Her, E. J. [1 ]
Ebert, M. A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kennedy, A. [2 ]
Reynolds, H. M. [4 ]
Sun, Y. [5 ]
Williams, S. [4 ,6 ]
Haworth, A. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Sch Phys Math & Comp, Perth, WA, Australia
[2] Sir Charles Gairdner Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Perth, WA, Australia
[3] 5D Clin, Perth, WA, Australia
[4] Univ Melbourne, Sir Peter MacCallum Dept Oncol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Univ Sydney, Inst Med Phys, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[6] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Div Radiat Oncol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
prostate cancer; hypofractionation; tumour control probability; IMRT; multiparametric MRI;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6560/ab9354
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Hypofractionation of prostate cancer radiotherapy achieves tumour control at lower total radiation doses, however, increased rectal and bladder toxicities have been observed. To realise the radiobiological advantage of hypofractionation whilst minimising harm, the potential reduction in dose to organs at risk was investigated for biofocused radiotherapy. Patient-specific tumour location and cell density information were derived from multiparametric imaging. Uniform-dose plans and biologically-optimised plans were generated for a standard schedule (78 Gy/39 fractions) and hypofractionated schedules (60 Gy/20 fractions and 36.25 Gy/5 fractions). Results showed that biologically-optimised plans yielded statistically lower doses to the rectum and bladder compared to isoeffective uniform-dose plans for all fractionation schedules. A reduction in the number of fractions increased the target dose modulation required to achieve equal tumour control. On average, biologically-optimised, moderately-hypofractionated plans demonstrated 15.3% (p-value: <0.01) and 23.8% (p-value: 0.02) reduction in rectal and bladder dose compared with standard fractionation. The tissue-sparing effect was more pronounced in extreme hypofractionation with mean reduction in rectal and bladder dose of 43.3% (p-value: < 0.01) and 41.8% (p-value: 0.02), respectively. This study suggests that the ability to utilise patient-specific tumour biology information will provide greater incentive to employ hypofractionation in the treatment of localised prostate cancer with radiotherapy. However, to exploit the radiobiological advantages given by hypofractionation, greater attention to geometric accuracy is required due to increased sensitivity to treatment uncertainties.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [21] The impact of the three degrees-of-freedom fiducial marker-based setup compared to soft tissue-based setup in hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer
    Tanabe, Satoshi
    Utsunomiya, Satoru
    Abe, Eisuke
    Sato, Hiraku
    Ohta, Sushi
    Sakai, Hironori
    Yamada, Takumi
    Kaidu, Motoki
    Aoyama, Hidefumi
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 20 (06): : 53 - 59
  • [22] Dose Escalation Using a Hypofractionated, Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Boost for Localized Prostate Cancer: Preliminary Results Addressing Concerns of High or Low α/β Ratio
    Shridhar, Ravi
    Bolton, Sue
    Joiner, Michael C.
    Forman, Jeffrey D.
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2009, 7 (03) : E52 - E57
  • [23] Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Causes Fewer Side Effects than Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy When Used in Combination With Brachytherapy for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer
    Forsythe, Kevin
    Blacksburg, Seth
    Stone, Nelson
    Stock, Richard G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 83 (02): : 630 - 635
  • [24] Long-term Tumor Control and Late Toxicity in Patients with Prostate Cancer Receiving Hypofractionated (2.2 Gy) Soft-tissue-matched Image-guided Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy
    Shimizu, Daisuke
    Yamazaki, Hideya
    Nishimura, Takuya
    Aibe, Norihiro
    Okabe, Haruumi
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 37 (10) : 5829 - 5835
  • [25] High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Monotherapy versus Image-Guided Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy with Helical Tomotherapy for Patients with Localized Prostate Cancer
    Yamazaki, Hideya
    Masui, Koji
    Suzuki, Gen
    Nakamura, Satoaki
    Shimizu, Daisuke
    Nishikawa, Tatsuyuki
    Okabe, Haruumi
    Yoshida, Ken
    Kotsuma, Tadayuki
    Tanaka, Eiichi
    Otani, Keisuke
    Yoshioka, Yasuo
    Ogawa, Kazuhiko
    CANCERS, 2018, 10 (09)
  • [26] Dosimetric feasibility of moderately hypofractionated/dose escalated radiation therapy for localised prostate cancer with intensity-modulated proton beam therapy using simultaneous integrated boost (SIB-IMPT) and impact of hydrogel prostate-rectum spacer
    Ahmad Khalil, Dalia
    Jazmati, Danny
    Geismar, Dirk
    Wulff, Jorg
    Baeumer, Christian
    Kramer, Paul Heinz
    Steinmeier, Theresa
    Schulze Schleitthoff, Stefanie
    Plaude, Sandija
    Bischoff, Martin
    Tschirdewahn, Stephan
    Hadaschik, Boris
    Timmermann, Beate
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2022, 17 (01)
  • [27] EVALUATING THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN RECTAL NORMAL TISSUE COMPLICATION PROBABILITY AND THE PORTION OF SEMINAL VESICLES INCLUDED IN THE CLINICAL TARGET VOLUME IN INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY FOR PROSTATE CANCER
    Gluck, Iris
    Vineberg, Karen A.
    Haken, Randall K. Ten
    Sandler, Howard M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 73 (02): : 334 - 340
  • [28] A Treatment Planning and Acute Toxicity Comparison of Two Pelvic Nodal Volume Delineation Techniques and Delivery Comparison of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Versus Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Hypofractionated High-Risk Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy
    Myrehaug, Sten
    Chan, Gordon
    Craig, Tim
    Weinberg, Vivian
    Cheng, Chun
    Roach, Mack, III
    Cheung, Patrick
    Sahgal, Arjun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 82 (04): : E657 - E662
  • [29] Treatment outcome of high-dose image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy using intra-prostate fiducial markers for localized prostate cancer at a single institute in Japan
    Ken Takeda
    Yoshihiro Takai
    Kakutaro Narazaki
    Masatoshi Mitsuya
    Rei Umezawa
    Noriyuki Kadoya
    Yukio Fujita
    Toshiyuki Sugawara
    Masaki Kubozono
    Eiji Shimizu
    Keiko Abe
    Yuko Shirata
    Yohjiro Ishikawa
    Takaya Yamamoto
    Maiko Kozumi
    Suguru Dobashi
    Haruo Matsushita
    Koichi Chida
    Shigeto Ishidoya
    Yoichi Arai
    Keiichi Jingu
    Shogo Yamada
    Radiation Oncology, 7
  • [30] Treatment outcome of high-dose image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy using intra-prostate fiducial markers for localized prostate cancer at a single institute in Japan
    Takeda, Ken
    Takai, Yoshihiro
    Narazaki, Kakutaro
    Mitsuya, Masatoshi
    Umezawa, Rei
    Kadoya, Noriyuki
    Fujita, Yukio
    Sugawara, Toshiyuki
    Kubozono, Masaki
    Shimizu, Eiji
    Abe, Keiko
    Shirata, Yuko
    Ishikawa, Yohjiro
    Yamamoto, Takaya
    Kozumi, Maiko
    Dobashi, Suguru
    Matsushita, Haruo
    Chida, Koichi
    Ishidoya, Shigeto
    Arai, Yoichi
    Jingu, Keiichi
    Yamada, Shogo
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2012, 7