THE EARLY MODERN ORIGINS OF BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS

被引:1
作者
Boyd, Richard [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgetown Univ, Govt, Washington, DC 20057 USA
关键词
Behavioral psychology; history of economics; rational choice; early modern philosophy; Francis Bacon; Thomas Hobbes; Adam Smith; cognitive biases; POLITICAL-SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1017/S0265052520000035
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
For all the recent discoveries of behavioral psychology and experimental economics, the spirit of homo economicus still dominates the contemporary disciplines of economics, political science, and sociology. Turning back to the earliest chapters of political economy, however, reveals that pioneering figures such as Francis Bacon, Thomas Hobbes, and Adam Smith were hardly apostles of economic rationality as they are often portrayed in influential narratives of the development of the social sciences. As we will see, while all three of these thinkers can plausibly be read as endorsing "rationality," they were also well aware of the systematic irrationality of human conduct, including a remarkable number of the cognitive biases later "discovered" by contemporary behavioral economists. Building on these insights I offer modest suggestions for how these thinkers, properly understood, might carry the behavioral revolution in different directions than those heretofore suggested.
引用
收藏
页码:30 / 54
页数:25
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
Amadae S. M., 2003, RATIONALIZING CAPITA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1968, F BACON MAGIC SCI
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Predictably irrational: The hidden forces that shape our decisions
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2002, EC J
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2015, MISBEHAVING MAKING B
[6]   Adam Smith, behavioral economist [J].
Ashraf, N ;
Camerer, CF ;
Loewenstein, G .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2005, 19 (03) :131-145
[7]  
Bacons, 2000, NEW ORGANON, P40
[8]  
Baumgold Deborah., 1988, Hobbes's Political Theory
[9]  
Blumenberg Hans, 1983, LEGITIMACY MODERN AG, P383
[10]  
BOX I, 1982, HIST POLIT THOUGHT, V3, P31