An empirical investigation of online review helpfulness: A big data perspective

被引:96
|
作者
Choi, Hoon S. [1 ]
Leon, Steven [2 ]
机构
[1] Appalachian State Univ, Dept Comp Informat Syst, Walker Coll Business, 416 Howard St,2113 Peacock Hall, Boone, NC 28608 USA
[2] Appalachian State Univ, Dept Mkt Supply Chain Management, Walker Coll Business, 416 Howard St,4055 Peacock Hall, Boone, NC 28608 USA
关键词
Review helpfulness; eWOM; amazon.com; Big data; Review/source/context factors; WORD-OF-MOUTH; CONSUMER REVIEWS; USER REVIEWS; ELECTRONIC COMMERCE; PRODUCT VARIETY; HOTEL REVIEWS; EWOM; INFORMATION; SALES; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.dss.2020.113403
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This study investigates the determinants of online review helpfulness, adopting various predictors from three dimensions of the online review management: source factors, review factors, and context factors. Based on a large, comprehensive dataset that includes 14,051,211 online reviews in 24 product categories from an ecommerce retailer, Amazon.com, this study provides empirical evidence on the effect of source and reviews factors on perceived review helpfulness, which the extant literature has reached inconsistent conclusions. In addition, this study considers the effects on review helpfulness created by context factors: product satisfaction, product popularity, product intangibility, and product variety. These factors are scarcely discussed in the existing literature. The major findings include (1) review extremity, review depth, and reviewer expertise have a positive effect on review helpfulness; (2) review inconsistency, product intangibility, product satisfaction, product popularity, product variety, and reviewer experience have negative effects; and (3) product intangibility moderates the effect of review extremity and depth on review helpfulness.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Analysis of Review Helpfulness Based on Consumer Perspective
    Chen, Yuanlin
    Chai, Yueting
    Liu, Yi
    Xu, Yang
    TSINGHUA SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 20 (03) : 293 - 305
  • [22] Exploring the comparative importance of online hotel reviews' heuristic attributes in review helpfulness: a conjoint analysis approach
    Yang, Sung-Byung
    Shin, Seung-Hun
    Joun, Youhee
    Koo, Chulmo
    JOURNAL OF TRAVEL & TOURISM MARKETING, 2017, 34 (07) : 963 - 985
  • [23] Evaluating content quality and helpfulness of online product reviews: The interplay of review helpfulness vs. review content
    Korfiatis, Nikolaos
    Garcia-Bariocanal, Elena
    Sanchez-Alonso, Salvador
    ELECTRONIC COMMERCE RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2012, 11 (03) : 205 - 217
  • [24] Assessing restaurant review helpfulness through big data: dual-process and social influence theory
    Kwon, Wooseok
    Lee, Minwoo
    Back, Ki-Joon
    Lee, Kyung Young
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY AND TOURISM TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 12 (02) : 177 - 195
  • [25] Understanding online review helpfulness: a pleasure-arousal-dominance (PAD) model perspective
    Xu, Wuhuan
    Yao, Zhong
    He, Dandan
    Cao, Ling
    ASLIB JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2025, 77 (02) : 391 - 412
  • [26] The effects of corporate, review and reviewer characteristics on the helpfulness of online reviews: the moderating role of culture
    Lee, Jungwon
    Park, Cheol
    INTERNET RESEARCH, 2022, 32 (05) : 1562 - 1594
  • [28] A concept-level approach to the analysis of online review helpfulness
    Qazi, Aika
    Syed, Karim Bux Shah
    Raj, Ram Gopal
    Cambria, Erik
    Tahir, Muhammad
    Alghazzawi, Daniyal
    COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2016, 58 : 75 - 81
  • [29] Do topic consistency and linguistic style similarity affect online review helpfulness? An elaboration likelihood model perspective
    Yang, Shuiqing
    Zhou, Chuanmei
    Chen, Yuangao
    INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, 2021, 58 (03)
  • [30] What makes peer review helpfulness evaluation in online review communities? An empirical research based on persuasion effect
    Wang, Yani
    Wang, Jun
    Yao, Tang
    Li, Ming
    ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW, 2020, 44 (06) : 1267 - 1286